- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:57:59 +0100
- To: "Web APIs WG \(public\)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
"Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> > I didn't really like it either, I was hoping for comments :-) It seems > extensibility in the DOM in general is a bit unaddressed. Yep, :-( >> Extension requirements similar to ECMAScript would be a much more >> logical approach. > > Pointer? Well it pretty much says "do what you want!" http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/Ecma-262.pdf section 2 A conforming implementation of ECMAScript is permitted to provide additional types, values, objects, properties, and functions beyond those described in this specification. In particular, a conforming implementation of ECMAScript is permitted to provide properties not described in this specification, and values for those properties, for objects that are described in this specification. A conforming implementation of ECMAScript is permitted to support program and regular expression syntax not described in this specification. In particular, a conforming implementation of ECMAScript is permitted to support program syntax that makes use of the "future reserved words" listed in 7.5.3 of this specification.
Received on Friday, 21 April 2006 20:59:24 UTC