- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 02:02:07 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > 1. To define the object as we want it be implemented in the end. > (This does not necessarily mean adding new features.) There are *a lot* of features about XHR that I would like people to use in the end. onreadystatechange would be nice to get people off of entierly for example since having separate onload, onprogress and onerror is a lot easier to use. > 2. Better for new implementations. I can agree to that. > 3. One implementation already does it, two others are planning. And the one with the vast majority of users does not as far as we know. / Jonas
Received on Saturday, 8 April 2006 09:02:12 UTC