- From: Gorm Haug Eriksen <gormer@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 12:24:27 +0300
- To: "Web APIs WG" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Wasn't the rationale that Internet Explorer would not support this? This is probably still valid. However, I agree that it makes sense to implement it as an EventTarget. Cheers, - Gorm On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 12:05:35 +0300, Web APIs Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org> wrote: > ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? > > http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/webapi/issues/72 > > Raised by: Anne van Kesteren > On product: XMLHttpRequest > > I know we agreed to not do this for version 1.0 during our F2F (Oslo, > 2006), but > I'd like to revisit it given that there's at least one implementation > which is > doing this and it makes a lot more sense for other languages besides > ECMAScript. > Did I mention it just makes a lot of sense? > > (Another consequence of this will be that onreadystatechange becomes an > EventListener instead of a Function.)
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2006 10:24:37 UTC