Re: Issue: request bodies

+1 - makes sense.

On 2006/04/22, at 5:02 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:

> Current implementations silently ignore the body in this case. It  
> seems like a bad idea to change this to raising an exception, since  
> it could break existing content that blindly sets a body. But it  
> seems ok to change the requirement to require ignoring the body for  
> a specific list of methods, instead of allowing it only for a  
> specific list of methods, so long as this would not allow security  
> holes or violations of the http spec.

--
Mark Nottingham
mnot@yahoo-inc.com

Received on Sunday, 23 April 2006 01:40:49 UTC