public-webapi@w3.org from April 2006 by author

Al Gilman

• Re: in defence of listener discovery (ISSUE-32, ACTION-84) (Monday, 10 April)

Alex Russell

• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Saturday, 15 April)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - WHAT WG in Introduction section (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - testable assertions (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.abort() (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - DOM 3 Load and Save (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - clarity of language (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - version of reference technologies (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - testable assertions (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: ISSUE-43: change to "common baseline"? (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: ISSUE-47: responseText is not always accessible when readyState < 3 (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest readystatechange events (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - WHAT WG in Introduction section (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Class of Products (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - no interoperable implementations (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - DOM 3 Load and Save (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - testable assertions (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - clarity of language (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - version of reference technologies (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Friday, 21 April)
• ISSUE-31: default character encoding XHR (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: No arguments to XMLHttpRequest.send (ACTION-58) (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - history in Introduction section (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Abstract section (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: XHR timeout and browsing context destruction (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: A typo in the XMLHttpRequest Object spec (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: Small typo (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: References in XHR spec (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest object suggestion (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? (Saturday, 8 April)
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? (Saturday, 8 April)
• Re: ISSUE-74: what does it mean for XHR to support more methods? (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: ISSUE-71: setRequestHeader has too many header restrictions (Friday, 7 April)
• XMLHttpRequest status update (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Partial Information when in Receiving state (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: The XMLHttpRequest Object - W3C Working Draft 05 April 2006 (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-60: Should Window Object 1.0 include access to frames by name (window.frames)? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-63: Should Window 1.0 drop the arguably redundant requirment on UIEvent.view? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: random notes on the XHR editorial notes (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren't being presented be required to have a null defaultView? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: Some XHR comments (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: Some XHR comments (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ACTION-126: What is DOM3EV about... (Tuesday, 4 April)
• ACTION-126: What is DOM3EV about... (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-68: What to do about window.location.toString()? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Monday, 3 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Monday, 3 April)
• Re: ACTION-87: Selectors API (Monday, 3 April)
• Re: ACTION-87: Selectors API (Monday, 3 April)
• Re: [SVGMobile12] event aliasing (Monday, 3 April)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: Any update on telcon times? (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: Any update on telcon times? (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: ISSUE-77: DOM3EV: Effect of evt.currentTarget.add/removeEL (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: DOM3EV: Editorial comments (Wednesday, 19 April)
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Second proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Second proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: ACTION-25: Make a proposal for the additions that the mobile folks have been asking for in keyboard events (Saturday, 15 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Tuesday, 11 April)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest readystatechange events (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Sunday, 23 April)
• XMLHttpRequest progress events (Sunday, 23 April)
• XMLHttpRequest readystatechange events (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Saturday, 22 April)
• Provisions for canceling XMLHttpRequests (Friday, 21 April)
• Question on what "the script's context" means (Friday, 21 April)
• XMLHttpRequest test suite suggestion (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Wednesday, 19 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Wednesday, 19 April)
• Re: ACTION-61: text for embedding part of the Window object (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: ISSUE-71: setRequestHeader has too many header restrictions (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: several messages (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: Some XHR comments (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Monday, 3 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Monday, 3 April)

Brad Fults

• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: ISSUE-60: Should Window Object 1.0 include access to frames by name (window.frames)? (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? (Wednesday, 5 April)

Bruno Cuart

• The XMLHttpRequest Object - W3C Working Draft 05 April 2006 (Friday, 7 April)

Cameron McCormack

• Re: DOM3EV: Editorial comments (Thursday, 20 April)
• DOM3EV: Which events are fired for name mutations (Thursday, 20 April)
• DOM3EV: Specifying inappropriate modifiers to MouseEvent.initMouseEventNS (Thursday, 20 April)
• DOM3EV: MouseEvent.client[XY] clarification (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: DOM3EV: Editorial comments (Wednesday, 19 April)
• Re: DOM3EV: Editorial comments (Monday, 17 April)
• DOM3EV: Editorial comments (Sunday, 16 April)
• Re: ACTION-25: Make a proposal for the additions that the mobile folks have been asking for in keyboard events (Saturday, 15 April)
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: several messages (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: Some XHR comments (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: Some XHR comments (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Some XHR comments (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-68: What to do about window.location.toString()? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? (Tuesday, 4 April)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: ACTION-52 - open() and authentication (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: in defence of listener discovery (ISSUE-32, ACTION-84) (Monday, 10 April)
• minutes 2006-03-20 (Sunday, 9 April)
• Minutes 2006-03-27 (Sunday, 9 April)
• ACTION-52 - open() and authentication (Tuesday, 4 April)

Christophe Jolif

• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Wednesday, 5 April)

Daniel Schierbeck

• XHR constructor example (Saturday, 15 April)

Daniel Weitzner

• Re: the XML HttpRequest Object (Monday, 10 April)

Darin Fisher

• re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 11 April)

David Flanagan

• Re: cookies and XMLHttpRequest (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: cookies and XMLHttpRequest (Monday, 24 April)
• XMLHttpRequest.abort() (Friday, 21 April)
• cookies and XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 21 April)

Dean Jackson

• DOM Level 3 Events publication (Thursday, 13 April)
• First Public WD of Window released (Monday, 10 April)

Doug Schepers

• Pressure Sensitivity for Tablets (Friday, 14 April)
• RE: ACTION-25: Make a proposal for the additions that the mobile folks have been asking for in keyboard events (Friday, 14 April)
• RE: ACTION-25: Make a proposal for the additions that the mobile folks have been asking for in keyboard events (Friday, 14 April)
• RE: Proposal for mousewheel events (Tuesday, 11 April)
• RE: Proposal for mousewheel events (Tuesday, 11 April)
• RE: Proposal for mousewheel events (Monday, 10 April)
• RE: [SVGMobile12] event aliasing (Sunday, 2 April)

Douglas Livingstone

• Small typo (Tuesday, 11 April)

Gorm Haug Eriksen

• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Wednesday, 19 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: Extension HTTP methods (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? (Thursday, 6 April)

Hallvord R. M. Steen

• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents (Monday, 24 April)
• XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents (Friday, 21 April)

Ian Davis

• Re: several messages (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Second proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Second proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 18 April)
• XMLHttpRequestTestSuite in CVS (Monday, 3 April)

Ian Hickson

• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents (Thursday, 27 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - testable assertions (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.abort() (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - testable assertions (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: cookies and XMLHttpRequest (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: several messages (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: several messages (Tuesday, 18 April)
• (XMLHttpRequest 2) Second proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Monday, 17 April)
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Monday, 17 April)
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Monday, 17 April)
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: ACTION-25: Make a proposal for the additions that the mobile folks have been asking for in keyboard events (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: Potential security risk of XHR in distributed authoring (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 11 April)
• re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 11 April)
• (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? (Sunday, 9 April)
• Re: ISSUE-71: setRequestHeader has too many header restrictions (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: ISSUE-71: setRequestHeader has too many header restrictions (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: several messages (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: several messages (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: several messages (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-71: setRequestHeader has too many header restrictions (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-69: Should Location.reload() take an optional bool argument to force reload? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-67: Should resolution of relative URI references sent to location (unknown charset) be defined in JS bindings or generally? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-64: Should the Window spec define Window\'s place in DOM event flow? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-64: Should the Window spec define Window\'s place in DOM event flow? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• RE: [SVGMobile12] event aliasing (Monday, 3 April)

Jack Jansen

• Re: [SVGMobile12] event aliasing (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: [SVGMobile12] event aliasing (Sunday, 2 April)

Jim Ley

• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object Suggestion (Saturday, 29 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: several messages (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: Small typo (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: passive Copy-and-Paste with scripts (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? (Sunday, 9 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback (Sunday, 9 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback (Sunday, 9 April)
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? (Saturday, 8 April)
• Re: ISSUE-71: setRequestHeader has too many header restrictions (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ACTION-126: What is DOM3EV about... (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Monday, 3 April)

Jon Ferraiolo

• RE: [SVGMobile12] event aliasing (Sunday, 2 April)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents (Thursday, 27 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: Any update on telcon times? (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: cookies and XMLHttpRequest (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: No arguments to XMLHttpRequest.send (ACTION-58) (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: cookies and XMLHttpRequest (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest test suite suggestion (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: Issue: request bodies (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: ISSUE-77: DOM3EV: Effect of evt.currentTarget.add/removeEL (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: ACTION-25: Make a proposal for the additions that the mobile folks have been asking for in keyboard events (Saturday, 15 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Saturday, 15 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Saturday, 15 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: in defence of listener discovery (ISSUE-32, ACTION-84) (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: passive Copy-and-Paste with scripts (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: minutes 2006-03-20 (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback (Sunday, 9 April)
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? (Sunday, 9 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback (Sunday, 9 April)
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? (Saturday, 8 April)
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? (Saturday, 8 April)
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? (Saturday, 8 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest status update (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: ISSUE-71: setRequestHeader has too many header restrictions (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: passive Copy-and-Paste with scripts (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: random notes on the XHR editorial notes (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: random notes on the XHR editorial notes (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: XHR timeout and browsing context destruction (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: Some XHR comments (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-68: What to do about window.location.toString()? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-67: Should resolution of relative URI references sent to location be defined in JS bindings or generally? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft (Saturday, 1 April)

Julian Reschke

• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: Issue: request bodies (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: Issue: request bodies (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Wednesday, 19 April)
• Potential security risk of XHR in distributed authoring (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Tuesday, 11 April)

Karl Dubost

• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - testable assertions (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - WHAT WG in Introduction section (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Class of Products (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - no interoperable implementations (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - DOM 3 Load and Save (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - clarity of language (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - version of reference technologies (Wednesday, 26 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - history in Introduction section (Wednesday, 26 April)
• [comment] Window Object 1.0 - URI (Friday, 14 April)
• [comment] Window Object 1.0 - References (Friday, 14 April)
• [comment] Window Object 1.0 - HTML User Agent (Friday, 14 April)
• [comment] Window Object 1.0 - General Comment (Friday, 14 April)
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Class of Products (Wednesday, 12 April)
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - history in Introduction section (Wednesday, 12 April)
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - WHAT WG in Introduction section (Wednesday, 12 April)
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - no interoperable implementations (Wednesday, 12 April)
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Abstract section (Wednesday, 12 April)
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Conformance Model (Wednesday, 12 April)
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - DOM 3 Load and Save (Wednesday, 12 April)
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - testable assertions (Wednesday, 12 April)
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - clarity of language (Wednesday, 12 April)
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - version of reference technologies (Wednesday, 12 April)
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Wednesday, 12 April)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents (Thursday, 27 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Sunday, 23 April)
• [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: Issue: request bodies (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: ACTION-25: Make a proposal for the additions that the mobile folks have been asking for in keyboard events (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Shoud window participate in event propagation (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Tuesday, 11 April)
• XHR: restrictions on request headers (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? (Monday, 10 April)
• Core DOM class extensions that are in many browsers (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: several messages (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? (Friday, 7 April)
• RESOLUTION? Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? (Friday, 7 April)
• RESOLUTION? Re: ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history? (Friday, 7 April)
• RESOLUTION? Re: ISSUE-68: What to do about window.location.toString()? (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: several messages (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-68: What to do about window.location.toString()? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-64: Should the Window spec define Window\'s place in DOM event flow? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history? (Tuesday, 4 April)

Mark Baker

• Re: Issue: request bodies (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: Issue: request bodies (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: Issue: request bodies (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Thursday, 20 April)

Mark Birbeck

• RE: XMLHttpRequest object suggestion (Tuesday, 18 April)

Mark Kawakami

• XMLHttpRequest object suggestion (Monday, 17 April)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: Issue: request bodies (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: Issue: request bodies (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: Issue: request bodies (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Friday, 21 April)
• Issue: request bodies (Friday, 21 April)
• Issue: Authentication Credentials (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Monday, 17 April)
• FYI: XHR HTTP tests updated (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback (Friday, 7 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback (Thursday, 6 April)
• XMLHttpRequest Object feedback (Thursday, 6 April)

Mike Norton

• the XML HttpRequest Object (Monday, 10 April)

Patrick Kohler

• XMLHttpRequest Object Suggestion (Friday, 28 April)

Paul Libbrecht

• Re: passive Copy-and-Paste with scripts (Monday, 10 April)

Pawel Glowacki

• A typo in the XMLHttpRequest Object spec (Tuesday, 11 April)

Pete Kirkham

• Extension HTTP methods (Saturday, 15 April)

Robin Berjon

• New co-chair: Charles McCathieNevile (Tuesday, 25 April)
• Re: Any update on telcon times? (Monday, 24 April)
• F2F registration questionnaire (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest readystatechange events (Monday, 24 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest readystatechange events (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Sunday, 23 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Saturday, 22 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: DOM3EV: Which events are fired for name mutations (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: DOM3EV: Specifying inappropriate modifiers to MouseEvent.initMouseEventNS (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: DOM3EV: Editorial comments (Thursday, 20 April)
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Tuesday, 18 April)
• Re: DOM3EV: Editorial comments (Sunday, 16 April)
• ACTION-25: Make a proposal for the additions that the mobile folks have been asking for in keyboard events (Friday, 14 April)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Shoud window participate in event propagation (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers (Tuesday, 11 April)
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? (Sunday, 9 April)
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? (Sunday, 9 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback (Sunday, 9 April)
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? (Sunday, 9 April)
• Fwd: Unanticipated publication outage: 14-19 April (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-74: what does it mean for XHR to support more methods? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? (Thursday, 6 April)
• Re: random notes on the XHR editorial notes (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released (Wednesday, 5 April)
• random notes on the XHR editorial notes (Wednesday, 5 April)
• First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? (Tuesday, 4 April)

Sjoerd Visscher

• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events (Monday, 10 April)

Stéphane Sire

• ISSUE-33 and ISSUE-56: multiple device events and mousewheel events (Tuesday, 11 April)
• XHR timeout and browsing context destruction (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: ACTION-126: What is DOM3EV about... (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: [SVGMobile12] event aliasing (Tuesday, 4 April)

Web APIs Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-77: DOM3EV: Effect of evt.currentTarget.add/removeEL (Wednesday, 19 April)
• ISSUE-76: Shoud window participate in event propagation (Wednesday, 12 April)
• ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? (Thursday, 6 April)
• ISSUE-74: what does it mean for XHR to support more methods? (Thursday, 6 April)
• ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? (Thursday, 6 April)
• ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? (Thursday, 6 April)
• ISSUE-71: setRequestHeader has too many header restrictions (Thursday, 6 April)
• ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• ISSUE-69: Should Location.reload() take an optional bool argument to force reload? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• ISSUE-68: What to do about window.location.toString()? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• ISSUE-67: Should resolution of relative URI references sent to location be defined in JS bindings or generally? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• ISSUE-64: Should the Window spec define Window\'s place in DOM event flow? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• ISSUE-63: Should Window 1.0 drop the arguably redundant requirment on UIEvent.view? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• ISSUE-61: Should the Window spec drop any conformance requirements for AbstractViews besides the defaultView? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• ISSUE-61: Should the Window spec drop any conformance requirements for AbstractViews besides the defaultView? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• ISSUE-60: Should Window Object 1.0 include access to frames by name (window.frames)? (Tuesday, 4 April)
• ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history? (Monday, 3 April)
• ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object (Monday, 3 April)

Łukasz Lach

• Re: ACTION-48 Draft text for XHR listing commonly implemented properties and methods that we don't specify (Monday, 3 April)

Last message date: Saturday, 29 April 2006 18:05:31 UTC