- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:01:28 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Apr 23, 2006, at 11:51, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 05:18:24 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak
> <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
>> That being said, whether all methods are uppercased or only the
>> methods that get significant use, is not really a major issue. But
>> let's not just casually increase spec complexity without doing our
>> due diligence.
>
> We also haven't decided yet, ISSUE-74, whether or not to allow
> arbitrary method names. Internet Explorer 7, for one, doesn't
> support it as has been pointed out earlier.
Is there a known reason for this?
IE7 is not yet legacy, though I guess it has the ability to be LOA
(Legacy On Arrival) which is a potential pain indeed.
--
Robin Berjon
Senior Research Scientist
Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Sunday, 23 April 2006 14:01:14 UTC