- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 05:06:29 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>, "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > In this case, an example of a spec using non-uppercase http method > names, or of a server requiring such, would demonstrate the need for the > feature. Anne demonstrated the need to uppercase 'get' and 'post' by > showing widely deployed JS libraries depending on this behavior. So far > no one has has made a similar demonstration of the benefits of not > uppercasing 'foobar'. I welcome such research and would gladly change my > tune based on the results. > > That being said, whether all methods are uppercased or only the methods > that get significant use, is not really a major issue. But let's not > just casually increase spec complexity without doing our due diligence. Again, hear hear. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 05:06:40 UTC