- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 02:22:33 -0700
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Web APIs WG <public-webapi@w3.org>
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 3, 2006, at 4:18 PM, Web APIs Issue Tracker wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history?
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/webapi/issues/59
>>
>> Raised by: Maciej Stachowiak
>> On product: Window
>>
>> Should the Window Object 1.0 specification cover the window.history
>> object, in addition to the current
>> planned scope? I think this may be necessary to give a sensible and
>> testable specification for the Location
>> object. And it will also simplify the definition of browsing context
>> and allow it to match what Web Apps
>> 1.0 says better.
>>
>> This affects the scope of the spec and planned interfaces so it is an
>> important issue to resolve to get the
>> spec "feature complete".
>
> BTW I should mention that History does not have a very complicated
> interface:
>
> interface History {
> readonly attribute length; // length only in the back direction
> void back();
> void forward();
> void go(in long steps); // may be negative for steps back
> }
If it's that simple i'd say we should do it.
/ Jonas
Received on Wednesday, 5 April 2006 09:22:37 UTC