- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 22:16:57 +0200
- To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:50:33 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: >>> So instead of "If the document was not an XML document" having "If >>> Content-Type did not contain such a media type"? > > Sounds good to me. Made this change. What Björn says makes sense, but since it's illegal to follow that convention... >>>> Of these, I only know for sure that text/xsl is in common use for >>>> sending XML content, even though it is unofficial and technically >>>> illegal. >>> >>> Any proposals? Personally I don't really care about any of them... >> >> I don't really care either, I'd be happy with a/x, t/x, and +xml. > > The only one not on the current list that Safari supports is text/xsl. Does Safari actually support it or just looks for it in the pseudo-attribute "type" on the style sheet processing instruction? I wonder if all implementations treat text/xsl as XML... -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 23 April 2006 20:17:22 UTC