- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:54:03 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 20:41:38 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > >> I think there is need for some perspective here. Mozilla isn't broken >> in that .send doesn't work at all or that we in some cases have very >> broken behaviour. We simply follow DOM convention and have all the >> parameters to the function required even if they in some cases are >> not needed. > > > I agree with Karl, Mark, others and myself that the specification > should be relevant in the future as well. It's now stated that > implementations MUST support send() to be invoked without arguments. > Specifically, the new text is: > > <p>Invoking <code>send()</code> without the <var>data</var> argument MUST > give the same result as if it was invoked with <code>null</code> as > argument.</p> I just don't see the point in doing this, and I thougth we had all agreed on SHOULD. However at this point the entire issue is getting slightly silly and turning into a waste of all of our time as there are more important issues. I just hope that tutorials will still urge people to pass null even for methods that don't need it. / Jonas
Received on Sunday, 23 April 2006 22:54:08 UTC