- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 05:12:59 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > > > Also, consider the following media types that represent XML data of > > some form, but are not text/xml, application/xml, or a type that ends > > in +xml. Some of these are unofficial or obsolete: > > > > text/xsl > > 364,000: http://www.google.com/search?q=text%2Fxsl > > [...] There's a big difference between example pages claiming that authors should set the type="" attribute to text/xsl, and servers actually using that MIME type in their Content-Type headers, let along in the Content-Type headers of content used from XMLHttpRequest. I'd recomend only looking at text/xml, application/xml, and */*+xml. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 05:13:08 UTC