- Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information  at schema.org Guha (Friday, 25 October)
- Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 25 October)
- schema.org and proto-data, was  Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org Martin Hepp (Monday, 28 October)
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed  from the human-readable information at schema.org Peter Patel-Schneider (Monday, 28 October)
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed  from the human-readable information at schema.org Guha (Tuesday, 29 October)
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed  from the human-readable information at schema.org Peter Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 29 October)
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed   from the human-readable information at schema.org Christian Bizer (Tuesday, 29 October)
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed  from the human-readable information at schema.org Guha (Tuesday, 29 October)
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed   from the human-readable information at schema.org Adrian Giurca (Wednesday, 30 October)
 
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed   from the human-readable information at schema.org Robert Schroeder (Tuesday, 29 October)
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed   from the human-readable information at schema.org Robert Schroeder (Tuesday, 29 October)
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed    from the human-readable information at schema.org Adrian Giurca (Wednesday, 30 October)
 
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed  from the human-readable information at schema.org Peter Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 29 October)
 
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed  from the human-readable information at schema.org Martin Hepp (Wednesday, 30 October)
- RE: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed   from the human-readable information at schema.org LeVan,Ralph (Wednesday, 30 October)
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed    from the human-readable information at schema.org Davis, Peter (Wednesday, 30 October)
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed  from the human-readable information at schema.org Peter Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 30 October)
- RE: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed   from the human-readable information at schema.org LeVan,Ralph (Wednesday, 30 October)
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed  from the human-readable information at schema.org Martin Hepp (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information  at schema.org Mike Bergman (Friday, 25 October)
Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 25 October)
Re: SKOS proposal - labels and notes Karen Coyle (Sunday, 20 October)
Re: SKOS proposal - labels and notes Antoine Isaac (Monday, 21 October)
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? Dan Scott (Monday,  7 October)
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? Aaron Bradley (Monday,  7 October)
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? Wes Turner (Monday,  7 October)
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? Martin Hepp (Tuesday,  8 October)
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? Karen Coyle (Tuesday,  8 October)
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? Martin Hepp (Tuesday,  8 October)
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? Guha (Tuesday,  8 October)
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? Cosmin Paun (Tuesday,  8 October)
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? Martin Hepp (Tuesday, 15 October)
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? Two types approach become valid now? Chilly Bang (Tuesday, 15 October)
- Warning of "two type approach": visible rich snippets disappear Chilly Bang (Wednesday, 23 October)
- Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and "schema:Box" Marc Twagirumukiza (Thursday, 24 October)
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and "schema:Box" Karen Coyle (Thursday, 24 October)
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and "schema:Box" Marc Twagirumukiza (Thursday, 24 October)
 
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and  "schema:Box" Mo McRoberts (Thursday, 24 October)
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and  "schema:Box" Marc Twagirumukiza (Thursday, 24 October)
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and   "schema:Box" Mo McRoberts (Thursday, 24 October)
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and   "schema:Box" Raj Singh (Thursday, 24 October)
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and "schema:Box" Thad Guidry (Thursday, 24 October)
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and "schema:Box" Thad Guidry (Thursday, 24 October)
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and  "schema:Box" Mo McRoberts (Thursday, 24 October)
 
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and   "schema:Box" Karen Coyle (Thursday, 24 October)
Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? Martin Hepp (Tuesday,  8 October)
Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? Chilly Bang (Tuesday,  8 October)
Re: Updated proposal for updating schema.org Events spec Martin Hepp (Sunday,  6 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Guha (Thursday,  3 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Guha (Sunday,  6 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Karen Coyle (Sunday,  6 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Stéphane Corlosquet (Monday,  7 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Karen Coyle (Tuesday,  8 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Thad Guidry (Tuesday,  8 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Vicki Tardif Holland (Tuesday,  8 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Bernard Vatant (Tuesday,  8 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Aaron Bradley (Tuesday,  8 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Thad Guidry (Tuesday,  8 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Guha (Tuesday,  8 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Young,Jeff (OR) (Wednesday,  9 October)
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Evain, Jean-Pierre (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Ed Summers (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion jean delahousse (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Ed Summers (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Dan Brickley (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Ed Summers (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Dan Brickley (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Ed Summers (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Jason Douglas (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Ed Summers (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Jarno van Driel (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Ed Summers (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Karen Coyle (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Martin Hepp (Wednesday,  9 October)
 
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Dan Brickley (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Martin Hepp (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Guha (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Karen Coyle (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Martin Hepp (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Stéphane Corlosquet (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Martin Hepp (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Martin Hepp (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion jean delahousse (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Martin Hepp (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Kingsley Idehen (Wednesday,  9 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Niklas Lindström (Wednesday,  9 October)
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Evain, Jean-Pierre (Tuesday,  8 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Kingsley Idehen (Tuesday,  8 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Stéphane Corlosquet (Tuesday,  8 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Karen Coyle (Tuesday,  8 October)
Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Amanda Vizedom (Monday,  7 October)
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Evain, Jean-Pierre (Monday,  7 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Guha (Monday,  7 October)
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Evain, Jean-Pierre (Monday,  7 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Thad Guidry (Monday,  7 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Stéphane Corlosquet (Monday,  7 October)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Kingsley Idehen (Monday,  7 October)
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Evain, Jean-Pierre (Monday,  7 October)
RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Jason Johnson (BING) (Monday,  7 October)
Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Antoine Isaac (Sunday, 20 October)
Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion Antoine Isaac (Monday, 28 October)is/hasAdaption Wallis,Richard (Wednesday,  2 October)
- Re: is/hasAdaption Liddy Nevile (Wednesday,  2 October)
- Re: is/hasAdaption Madeleine Rothberg (Thursday,  3 October)
- Re: is/hasAdaption Liddy Nevile (Thursday,  3 October)
- Re: is/hasAdaption Liddy Nevile (Friday,  4 October)
- Re: is/hasAdaption Charles McCathie Nevile (Friday,  4 October)
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption Matt Garrish (Friday,  4 October)
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption Charles McCathie Nevile (Friday,  4 October)
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption Matt Garrish (Friday,  4 October)
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption martin.quiazon@gmail.com (Monday,  7 October)
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption Liddy Nevile (Monday,  7 October)
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption Karen Coyle (Monday,  7 October)
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption Niklas Lindström (Monday,  7 October)
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption Karen Coyle (Tuesday,  8 October)
 
 
- Re: is/hasAdaption Karen Coyle (Friday,  4 October)
- Re: is/hasAdaption Liddy Nevile (Friday,  4 October)
last last cfp Paola Di Maio (Wednesday,  2 October)
accessHazard Madeleine Rothberg (Tuesday,  1 October)
Last message date: Thursday, 31 October 2013 20:49:36 UTC