- From: Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:38:57 -0700
- To: David Deering <david@touchpointdigital.net>
- Cc: Public Vocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 11 October 2013 22:39:23 UTC
Um, that concluding sentence was missing a few words; should have read: "And feel free to reopen the thread there if you have further questions (if you're on Google Plus and have joined that Community.)" On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > Since you're using schema.org already, there's no reason to use > data-vocabulary.org for reviews and ratings. > > The warning you saw is indeed a confusing message because schema.org does > not use "votes" but rather: > ratingCount - for votes > reviewCount - for count > > The Structured Data Testing Tool warning message here has simply not been > updated to reflect properties used with schema.org/AggregateRating. > > For more on this topic see this post and the comments attached there: > https://plus.google.com/104247085577497637405/posts/fFfwksGiMtv > > And feel reopen the thread there if have further questions (you're on > Google Plus and have joined that Community.) > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:59 AM, David Deering < > david@touchpointdigital.net> wrote: > >> Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Any help would be greatly >> appreciated. >> >> David >> >> >
Received on Friday, 11 October 2013 22:39:23 UTC