- From: Charles Myers <charlesm@benetech.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 09:38:10 +0000
- To: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@sidar.org>
- CC: Madeleine Rothberg <madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org>, "<a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com>" <a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com>, "<public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BF6649DA-1CFF-41C4-BEC2-54A447C3D8B3@benetech.org>
This is one of the problems with simple names that a person would type into an attribute vs. the deeper meaning. The deeper meaning is defined in the best practices guide at http://www.a11ymetadata.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/A11yMetadataProjectBestPracticesGuide_V.6final.pdf Hazards Some digital media can be physically dangerous to those who access it. It is commonly known that rates of flashing faster than 3Hz (3 times per second) can cause seizures, but loud repetitive sounds can have the same effect. Nausea is another hazard that can be brought on by motion simulation in visual resources. When a resource is known to contain such physical hazards, the user needs to discover their presence before accessing the content. Although adding warnings to the page may seem sufficient, such warnings are easily missed. The accessHazardproperty allows these physiological dangers to be identified so that a search engine can report the hazard. It has three predefined values to account for the abovementioned situations: flashing, soundand motionSimulation. I think that this is covered, especially as people would understand that this is a flashing hazard, not just a flashing attribute (part of why it is split into accessHazard and not a mediaFeature). On Oct 1, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@sidar.org<mailto:emmanuelle@sidar.org>> wrote: Hi all, I am concerned that the term "flashing" can be misleading or confusing. Something that flashes is not bad in itself, everything depends on the ratio of flashes per second. At least not for everyone. While something that flashes to any ratio can be annoying and even disabling for a person with attention deficit is not for everyone. And for something that flashes generate a seizure, certain conditions must be met. I think we need to be more precise. Perhaps there could be a general indicator for something that flashes and another for something that can generate seizures in some people. Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo Patrono y Directora General Fundación Sidar - Acceso Universal Email: coordina@sidar.org<mailto:coordina@sidar.org> Personal: Emmanuelle@sidar.org<mailto:Emmanuelle@sidar.org> Web: http://sidar.org De: a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com<mailto:a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com> [mailto:a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com<mailto:metadata-project@googlegroups.com>] En nombre de Madeleine Rothberg Enviado el: miércoles, 02 de octubre de 2013 0:43 Para: a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com<mailto:a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com>; public-vocabs@w3.org<mailto:public-vocabs@w3.org> Asunto: Re: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard Yes! Even better. Madeleine On 2013-10-01, at 6:11 PM, "Charles Myers" <charlesm@benetech.org<mailto:charlesm@benetech.org>> wrote: Charles McN had a great idea when he brought this up. But it may actually be a bit simpler to specify. Rather than sav * noFlashing * noMotionSimulation * noSound in addition to the three properties we have today * flashing * motionSimulation * sound we might just want to have a state of "none" (saying that you checked and that there are no hazards that you are aware of). That would change the spec to * flashing * motionSimulation * sound * none (or noHazard) which makes it cleaner. I think that saying the negative to each of the three properties would be a bit tedious. And, of course, not having the property means that it has not been checked. On Oct 1, 2013, at 1:38 PM, Madeleine Rothberg <madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org<mailto:madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org>> wrote: Chuck has updated the issues list to include the discussion of whether accessHazard should state positive or negative information. See that post and my comments, which are also below, at: [http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Accessibility/Issues_Tracker#accessHazar d_-_Ok_as_is.2C_or_should_it_be_negated_in_sense.3F] I believe we need both accessHazard=flashing and accessHazard=noFlashing, etc.. This is because there are three cases we'd like to distinguish: 1. checked and it's fine 2. checked and it is NOT fine 3. didn't check "Didn't check" can be signified by no metadata -- this will be most of the content on the Web. In cases where someone has checked, let's record both positive and negative states. -Madeleine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Accessibility Metadata Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email toa11y-metadata-project+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:a11y-metadata-project+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>. To post to this group, send email to a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com<mailto:a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Accessibility Metadata Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email toa11y-metadata-project+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:a11y-metadata-project+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>. To post to this group, send email to a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com<mailto:a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Accessibility Metadata Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to a11y-metadata-project+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:a11y-metadata-project+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>. To post to this group, send email to a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com<mailto:a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Accessibility Metadata Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to a11y-metadata-project+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:a11y-metadata-project+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>. To post to this group, send email to a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com<mailto:a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 09:38:41 UTC