- From: Mike Bergman <mike@mkbergman.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:09:01 -0500
- To: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Thanks, Niklas! On 10/10/2013 9:31 AM, Niklas Lindström wrote: > Hi Mike, > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Mike Bergman <mike@mkbergman.com > <mailto:mike@mkbergman.com>> wrote: > > Hi Niklas, > > Please see below . . . > > > On 10/9/2013 6:10 PM, Niklas Lindström wrote: > > > [...] > > (With this, other parts of well-known vocabularies, like DC and > FOAF, > > could be explicitly mapped to lessen the need for choice or > redundancy > in certain cases. And in a more distant future, perhaps this > "vocabulary > aliasing" practice could be extended to take other equivalencies > than > the ones schema.org <http://schema.org> <http://schema.org> > itself declares into account. > > E.g. using a pattern like the one we defined in RDFa 1.1, called > "Vocabulary Expansion" [2].) > > > It is unclear what the "very small sub-set of OWL entailment[s]" are > in the [2] reference. Could you expand or point to the definitive > reference? > > > That is the definitive reference – the details are further down in that > section. Specifically in "10.1.1 RDFa Vocabulary Entailment" [1]. > > (Granted, that in turn says: "The relevant rules are, using the rule > identifications in section 4.3 of [OWL2-PROFILES]): prp-spo1, prp-eqp1, > prp-eqp2, cax-sco, cax-eqc1, and cax-eqc2." – i.e. in [2].) > > Cheers, > Niklas > > [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#s_vocab_entailment > [2]: > http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/#Reasoning_in_OWL_2_RL_and_RDF_Graphs_using_Rules > > Thanks, Mike > > > Cheers, > Niklas > > [1]: > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/__webschema/file/3879206aa3f7/__schema.org/ext/dataset.html > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/file/3879206aa3f7/schema.org/ext/dataset.html> > [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-__syntax/#s_vocab_expansion > <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#s_vocab_expansion> > >
Received on Friday, 11 October 2013 14:09:33 UTC