- From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 08:20:19 +0200
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Jarno van Driel <jarno@quantumspork.nl>, "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Guha <guha@google.com>, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>, jean delahousse <delahousse.jean@gmail.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Oct 7, 2013, at 11:22 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> Can anyone here _not_ live with EnumConcept, given the various
> constraints and viewpoints expressed so far?
>
> Dan
I personally would prefer TerminologyConcept or TerminologicalConcept, because the notion of Enumeration and in particular the abbreviation Enum is, IMO, a bit difficult for broad audiences.
But I am not religious about it. EnumConcept could do.
Martin
--------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
twitter: mfhepp
Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Received on Tuesday, 8 October 2013 06:20:55 UTC