Thursday, 31 October 2013
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Reminder of accessibility metadata call coming up in an hour (9:00 AM PDT)
- RE: [a11y-metadata-project] Reminder of accessibility metadata call coming up in an hour (9:00 AM PDT)
- RE: [a11y-metadata-project] Reminder of accessibility metadata call coming up in an hour (9:00 AM PDT)
- Re: Country, external ennumeration?
- Re: Country, external ennumeration?
- Re: Country, external ennumeration?
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Minutes from the Accessibility Metadata working group call on October 29… The next call will be November 5
- Minutes from the Accessibility Metadata working group call on October 29… The next call will be November 5
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Reminder of accessibility metadata call coming up in an hour (9:00 AM PDT)
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Reminder of accessibility metadata call coming up in an hour (9:00 AM PDT)
Wednesday, 30 October 2013
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- RE: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- RE: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- RE: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- RE: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Reminder of accessibility metadata call coming up in an hour (9:00 AM PDT)
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Reminder of accessibility metadata call coming up in an hour (9:00 AM PDT)
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Reminder of accessibility metadata call coming up in an hour (9:00 AM PDT)
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
Tuesday, 29 October 2013
Wednesday, 30 October 2013
Tuesday, 29 October 2013
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Reminder of accessibility metadata call coming up in an hour (9:00 AM PDT)
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Reminder of accessibility metadata call coming up in an hour (9:00 AM PDT)
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Reminder of accessibility metadata call coming up in an hour (9:00 AM PDT)
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Reminder of accessibility metadata call coming up in an hour (9:00 AM PDT)
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] The next Accessibility Metadata call will be at 9:00 AM PDT on 10/29 to try to wrap on mediaFeature
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] The next Accessibility Metadata call will be at 9:00 AM PDT on 10/29 to try to wrap on mediaFeature
- Re: The next Accessibility Metadata call will be at 9:00 AM PDT on 10/29 to try to wrap on mediaFeature
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] The next Accessibility Metadata call will be at 9:00 AM PDT on 10/29 to try to wrap on mediaFeature
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] The next Accessibility Metadata call will be at 9:00 AM PDT on 10/29 to try to wrap on mediaFeature
Monday, 28 October 2013
- The next Accessibility Metadata call will be at 9:00 AM PDT on 10/29 to try to wrap on mediaFeature
- Re: schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: Skos, Schema.org and gender
- Re: Skos, Schema.org and gender
- schema.org and proto-data, was Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: Skos, Schema.org and gender
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
Sunday, 27 October 2013
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: Skos, Schema.org and gender
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
Saturday, 26 October 2013
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: Skos, Schema.org and gender
- Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: Skos, Schema.org and gender
Friday, 25 October 2013
- Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- Re: schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
- schema.org as reconstructed from the human-readable information at schema.org
Thursday, 24 October 2013
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and "schema:Box"
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and "schema:Box"
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and "schema:Box"
- Country, external ennumeration?
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and "schema:Box"
- Re: Cascading Types in a Meta Tag
- Re: Cascading Types in a Meta Tag
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and "schema:Box"
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and "schema:Box"
- Skos, Schema.org and gender
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and "schema:Box"
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and "schema:Box"
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and "schema:Box"
- Re: Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and "schema:Box"
- Re: Attaching a time interval to schema:PostalAddress
- Extending schema with 2 predicates "schema:houseNumber" and "schema:Box"
- Re: Attaching a time interval to schema:PostalAddress
- Cascading Types in a Meta Tag
Wednesday, 23 October 2013
- Warning of "two type approach": visible rich snippets disappear
- Re: Request for Comment: schema.org/InsurancePlan
- Re: Request for Comment: schema.org/InsurancePlan
- Re: Request for Comment: schema.org/InsurancePlan
- Request for Comment: schema.org/InsurancePlan
Tuesday, 22 October 2013
Monday, 21 October 2013
- Schema.org vocabulary collaboration - room available at ISWC2013, Sydney
- RE: SKOS and Freebase
- Re: SKOS and Freebase
- Re: SKOS proposal - labels and notes
- RE: SKOS and Freebase
- Re: SKOS proposal - labels and notes
- Re: SKOS proposal - labels and notes
- Re: SKOS and Freebase
- Re: SKOS and Freebase
- Re: SKOS and Freebase
- Re: SKOS and Freebase
- RE: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- Re: SKOS proposal - labels and notes
- Re: SKOS and Freebase
- Re: SKOS proposal - labels and notes
Sunday, 20 October 2013
- Re: SKOS proposal - labels and notes
- Re: SKOS proposal - labels and notes
- Re: SKOS and Freebase
- Re: SKOS proposal - labels and notes
- SKOS and Freebase
- SKOS proposal - labels and notes
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
Saturday, 19 October 2013
Friday, 18 October 2013
- Re: schema.org/MedicalClinic question
- Re: schema.org/MedicalClinic question
- Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
Thursday, 17 October 2013
- RE: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- Re: Schema.org Actions - an update and call for review
- Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process
- Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process
- Re: Semantically marking up a "checklist" or process
Tuesday, 15 October 2013
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? Two types approach become valid now?
- Re: CreativeWork relationships
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: On linking vocabularies (Was: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion)
- The Accessibility metadata group meeting for Oct 15 is cancelled. The next will be 9:00 AM PDT on October 22.
- Re: Proposal: Organization dissolutionDate
Monday, 14 October 2013
- Re: On linking vocabularies (Was: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion)
- Re: On linking vocabularies (Was: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion)
- Re: On linking vocabularies (Was: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion)
- Re: CreativeWork relationships
- Re: CreativeWork relationships
- Re: On linking vocabularies (Was: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion)
- Re: CreativeWork relationships
- Re: CreativeWork relationships
Sunday, 13 October 2013
Friday, 11 October 2013
- Re: schema.org/MedicalClinic question
- Re: schema.org/MedicalClinic question
- Re: On linking vocabularies (Was: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion)
- Re: schema.org/MedicalClinic question
Thursday, 10 October 2013
- RE: Updated proposal for updating schema.org Events spec
- Re: Updated proposal for updating schema.org Events spec
- Re: Updated proposal for updating schema.org Events spec
- Re: Updated proposal for updating schema.org Events spec
- RE: Updated proposal for updating schema.org Events spec
- schema.org/MedicalClinic question
- Re: On linking vocabularies (Was: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion)
- Re: Updated proposal for updating schema.org Events spec
- Re: On linking vocabularies (Was: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion)
- Re: On linking vocabularies (Was: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion)
Wednesday, 9 October 2013
- RE: Updated proposal for updating schema.org Events spec
- Re: Updated proposal for updating schema.org Events spec
- On linking vocabularies (Was: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion)
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: Facets was Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? - two types approach not valid
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? - two types approach not valid
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? - two types approach not valid
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? - two types approach not valid
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product? - two types approach not valid
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
Tuesday, 8 October 2013
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: Updated proposal for updating schema.org Events spec
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: Facets was Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: Facets was Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Facets was Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Notes from 10/7 accessibility metadata conference call, preparation for 10/8 9;00 AM PDT call
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
Monday, 7 October 2013
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- RE: Updated proposal for updating schema.org Events spec
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: schema.org/latitude page has been hijacked
- Re: CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: schema.org/latitude page has been hijacked
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- CreativeWork can't be a Product?
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: Updated proposal for updating schema.org Events spec
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: schema.org/latitude page has been hijacked
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Support non-commercial usage of schema.org/Offer - RDF(S) patch
- RE: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: schema.org/latitude page has been hijacked
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- schema.org/latitude page has been hijacked
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
Sunday, 6 October 2013
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: Updated proposal for updating schema.org Events spec
- Re: Multiple identical schemas
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- We've set the date and times for the next accessibility metadata calls
Saturday, 5 October 2013
Friday, 4 October 2013
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption
- Updated proposal for updating schema.org Events spec
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: is/hasAdaption
Thursday, 3 October 2013
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- ESWC 2014 Call for Papers
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- Re: is/hasAdaption
- 2nd CfP (deadline 31 Oct) Math. in Comp. Sci. Special Issue 'Enabling Domain Experts to use Formalised Reasoning'
- Re: Datatype in schema.org
- Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: is/hasAdaption
Wednesday, 2 October 2013
- Re: is/hasAdaption
- Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion
- is/hasAdaption
- last last cfp
- Conference calls being scheduled for accessibility metadata/ schema.org decisions
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard
- Re: accessHazard
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] an aside ...
- RE: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard
Tuesday, 1 October 2013
- RE: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard
- RE: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard
- Re: [a11y-metadata-project] accessHazard
- accessHazard
- ESWC 2014 Call for Tutorials
- ESWC 2014 Call for Workshops
- Re: Schema.org terms converted formats
- Re: Datatype in schema.org
- Extending the MedicalEntity ontology of schema.org --Follow up
- Datatype in schema.org
- Schema.org terms converted formats