- From: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:48:02 -0400
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Cc: Justin Boyan <jaboyan@google.com>, Willem-Siebe Spoelstra <wsspoelstra@gmail.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOr1obGwOuzzu40o67HsradF0mdDzom5NSV+L76m_h-Ltnupug@mail.gmail.com>
I like the idea of allowing values to cross domains as appropriate, so that we are not having to create more and more values to get around namespace issues. While I agree that canceled is related to actions, I don't know that we should force authors to jump through hoops to write their markup. For many use cases, I have an Order, Event, etc that I simply want to mark as canceled. Having to create an Action to wrap around my data seems awkward. While we are flushing out Actions, I hope we are able to avoid complicating the simple case. - Vicki Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > In this case, the notion of "canceled" is a fairly concrete meaning > semantically across almost all domains, I would say. So it should be > global in aspect for anyone wanting to use it. > > Having said that.. Canceled is action specific. And we already have the > idea of it ... here: http://schema.org/CancelAction > > See the full hierarchy as well, thus far : > http://schema.org/docs/full.html > > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Justin Boyan <jaboyan@google.com> wrote: > >> I agree that the use of schema.org/Enumeration, vs. external >> enumerations, is confusing. >> >> I would like to raise a related proposal, to make it easier to define and >> use internal Enumerations. Currently all enumeration values are defined in >> the global top-level schema.org namespace. For example, each value of >> the MedicalSpecialty <http://schema.org/MedicalSpecialty> enumeration, >> such as http://schema.org/Nursing, is a top-level entity. It therefore >> conflicts with any other proposed enumerations that might want to use >> Nursing as a value, or for that matter any proposed type named >> schema.org/Nursing. This isn't just a theoretical concern - there are >> currently at least three enumeration proposals (OrderStatus, ActionStatus, >> EventStatus) that all want to use "Canceled" as an enum value, but those >> notions of canceled can't be defined and documented separately given the >> global namespace. >> >> Proposal: can we define a local namespace for internal enumerations? How >> about a fragment naming scheme, like >> http://schema.org/OrderStatus#Canceled and >> http://schema.org/EventStatus#Canceled ? That scheme would also improve >> our documentation, keeping all the enum values and their descriptions >> organized on a single web page corresponding to their type. In markup, we >> could arrange to accept "Canceled" or "#Canceled" as shorthand entries for >> the enum value. >> >> Justin >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Willem-Siebe Spoelstra < >> wsspoelstra@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, on this schema.org blogpost<http://blog.schema.org/2012/05/schemaorg-markup-for-external-lists.html> I >>> read the follwing: >>> >>> Each schema.org type (such as Person <http://schema.org/Person>, >>>> PostalAddress <http://schema.org/PostalAddress>) is associated with a >>>> set of properties, such as >>>> "nationality", "addressCountry". In turn, each property has one or more >>>> expected types; in this case, both the "nationality" of a Person, and the >>>> "addressCountry" of a PostalAddress <http://schema.org/PostalAddress> expect >>>> to have a Country <http://schema.org/Country>value >>> >>> >>> So I took a look at the example in the same blogpost, and the specify >>> the country like this: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> <link itemprop="nationality" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States"/> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> When I read this blogpost <http://blog.schema.org/2012/11/good-relations-and-schemaorg.html> about Schema.org and Goodrelations, this is explained like: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> general approach for referencing 'external enumerations<http://blog.schema.org/2012/05/schemaorg-markup-for-external-lists.html> >>>> '. >>> >>> >>> However, when I look at the itemtype 'Country'<http://schema.org/Country>, >>> which is the expected type for the item properties 'nationality' and >>> 'addressCountry', I don't see anything explaining the above... >>> >>> It only tells me: >>> >>> A country >>> >>> >>> I do see a list of properties, but the best option there is to use >>> 'name' from 'Thing', which in that case should be 'text' just putting down >>> the name of the country. Nobody is explaining me that I have to link to, >>> for example, WikiPedia as explained in the blogpost. >>> >>> So, what's the best practise here? >>> >>> And why is 'Country' not a more specif type of Enumeration, >>> http://schema.org/Enumeration, >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Willem >>> >>> >> > > > -- > -Thad > +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> > Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/> >
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2013 16:48:30 UTC