- From: Marc Twagirumukiza <marc.twagirumukiza@agfa.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:15:37 +0200
- To: SchemaDot Org <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF7C8FE592.E66B62CC-ONC1257C0E.004C5FDE-C1257C0E.004E55AE@agfa.com>
Dear Schema.org community, We are trying to attach a time interval to schema:PostalAddress structure, and we hesitate with two suggestions. Can you advise? Here are suggestions (sorry to send them in turtle): ##1. RESIDENCY <http://example.org/resource/Natperson/person1#this> schema:hasResidentialStatus < http://example.org/resource/Residency/100#this>. <http://example.org/resource/Residency/100#this> a schema:ResidentialStatus; schema:address < http://example.org/PostalAddress/PostalAddress1#this>; schema:startDate "2009-11-01T09:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime; schema:endDate "2009-11-01T09:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime. ##2. ADDRESSES <http://example.org/PostalAddress/PostalAddress1#this> a schema:PostalAddress; schema:streetAddress "Via Pietro Panzeri"; schema:postalCode "20139"; schema:addressLocality "Milan"; schema:addressRegion "MI"; schema:addressCountry [a schema:Country; schema:name "Italy"]. This suggest to extend Schema.org with one predicate ("schema:hasResidentialStatus") and one class ("schema:ResidentialStatus") The second suggestion is to combine all in one structure model and use schema:contacType ##3. ADDRESSES <http://example.org/PostalAddress/PostalAddress1#this> a schema:PostalAddress; Schema:contacType [ schema:startDate "2009-11-01T09:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime; schema:endDate "2009-11-01T09:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime]; schema:streetAddress "Via Pietro Panzeri"; schema:postalCode "20139"; schema:addressLocality "Milan"; schema:addressRegion "MI"; schema:addressCountry [a schema:Country; schema:name "Italy"]. What do you think on two models? Kind Regards, Marc Twagirumukiza | Agfa HealthCare Senior Clinical Researcher | HE/Advanced Clinical Applications Research T +32 3444 8188 | M +32 499 713 300 http://www.agfahealthcare.com http://blog.agfahealthcare.com Click on link to read important disclaimer: http://www.agfahealthcare.com/maildisclaimer From: Robert Kost <rkost@thematix.com> To: SchemaDot Org <public-vocabs@w3.org> Date: 24/10/2013 15:51 Subject: Cascading Types in a Meta Tag Hi Dumb question #347: How does one nest RDFa type declarations in a <meta> tag? For example, the copyrightHolder of a CreativeWork is an Organization. Since the copyright holder isn’t explicitly stated on the page, it has to be declared in a <meta> tag. But this doesn’t look right: <div id="namespaces" prefix="schema: http://schema.org/ “> <div typeof="schema:VideoObject”> <meta property="copyrightHolder" typeof="schema:Organization" property="name" content=“Some Company"/> ... </div> </div> I know this is elementary stuff, but a fair amount of googling around failed to provide an answer, so I look to someone here. regards, Rob
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2013 14:16:05 UTC