- From: Marc Twagirumukiza <marc.twagirumukiza@agfa.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:15:37 +0200
- To: SchemaDot Org <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF7C8FE592.E66B62CC-ONC1257C0E.004C5FDE-C1257C0E.004E55AE@agfa.com>
Dear Schema.org community,
We are trying to attach a time interval to schema:PostalAddress structure,
and we hesitate with two suggestions. Can you advise?
Here are suggestions (sorry to send them in turtle):
##1. RESIDENCY
<http://example.org/resource/Natperson/person1#this>
schema:hasResidentialStatus <
http://example.org/resource/Residency/100#this>.
<http://example.org/resource/Residency/100#this>
a schema:ResidentialStatus;
schema:address <
http://example.org/PostalAddress/PostalAddress1#this>;
schema:startDate "2009-11-01T09:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime;
schema:endDate "2009-11-01T09:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime.
##2. ADDRESSES
<http://example.org/PostalAddress/PostalAddress1#this>
a schema:PostalAddress;
schema:streetAddress "Via Pietro Panzeri";
schema:postalCode "20139";
schema:addressLocality "Milan";
schema:addressRegion "MI";
schema:addressCountry [a schema:Country; schema:name "Italy"].
This suggest to extend Schema.org with one predicate
("schema:hasResidentialStatus") and one class ("schema:ResidentialStatus")
The second suggestion is to combine all in one structure model and use
schema:contacType
##3. ADDRESSES
<http://example.org/PostalAddress/PostalAddress1#this>
a schema:PostalAddress;
Schema:contacType [ schema:startDate
"2009-11-01T09:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime; schema:endDate
"2009-11-01T09:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime];
schema:streetAddress "Via Pietro Panzeri";
schema:postalCode "20139";
schema:addressLocality "Milan";
schema:addressRegion "MI";
schema:addressCountry [a schema:Country; schema:name "Italy"].
What do you think on two models?
Kind Regards,
Marc Twagirumukiza | Agfa HealthCare
Senior Clinical Researcher | HE/Advanced Clinical Applications Research
T +32 3444 8188 | M +32 499 713 300
http://www.agfahealthcare.com
http://blog.agfahealthcare.com
Click on link to read important disclaimer:
http://www.agfahealthcare.com/maildisclaimer
From: Robert Kost <rkost@thematix.com>
To: SchemaDot Org <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Date: 24/10/2013 15:51
Subject: Cascading Types in a Meta Tag
Hi
Dumb question #347:
How does one nest RDFa type declarations in a <meta> tag?
For example, the copyrightHolder of a CreativeWork is an Organization.
Since the copyright holder isn’t explicitly stated on the page, it has to
be declared in a <meta> tag. But this doesn’t look right:
<div id="namespaces" prefix="schema: http://schema.org/ “>
<div typeof="schema:VideoObject”>
<meta property="copyrightHolder" typeof="schema:Organization"
property="name" content=“Some Company"/>
...
</div>
</div>
I know this is elementary stuff, but a fair amount of googling around
failed to provide an answer, so I look to someone here.
regards,
Rob
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2013 14:16:05 UTC