Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> > ... in many many cases URLs can be used, ... but sometimes the thing
> > we point to can also be usefully described inline too, with further
> > properties and relationships. 'URL' is very very vague and doesn't
> > address the inline description possibility.
>
> Thanks Dan. I guess I'm failing to imagine a scenario where someone
> who was describing a job posting would want to describe an
> occupational category inline and relate it to other occupational
> categories (broader, narrower, etc), or make other skos like
> assertions.
>

Doesn't *somebody" have to define it inline?  Otherwise, how does it exist
for other people to refer to by URL?  :)