On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: ... > My inclination is to add a basic skos:Concept type and > broader/narrower links, but not necessarily to reflect all of SKOS > into schema.org. For schema.org we should focus on getting a lot more > instance data linked to these SKOS-describable vocabularies. For that > it helps if we can explicitly say ( within schema.org's self-contained > framework ) which schema.org properties can be used with SKOS-like > controlled lists. Adding a Concept type addresses this need. > In the context of Drupal, Concept and broader/narrower would be sufficient to cover the basic taxonomy scenario. schema:name and schema:description already exist for the term label and description. And for mapping local taxonomy terms URIs to say freebase URIs, I guess schema:sameAs could be used? Steph.
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 20:20:23 UTC