Re: SKOS for schema.org proposal for discussion from Ed Summers on 2013-10-09 (public-vocabs@w3.org from October 2013)

From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 11:09:03 -0400
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Cc: jean delahousse <delahousse.jean@gmail.com>, Guha <guha@google.com>, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>, Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, PublicVocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABzDd=6YfYEqongD=G1aveqHowAhS3=Brv9vA+gDSOiaHC7kBQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> ... in many many cases URLs can be used, ... but sometimes the thing
> we point to can also be usefully described inline too, with further
> properties and relationships. 'URL' is very very vague and doesn't
> address the inline description possibility.

Thanks Dan. I guess I'm failing to imagine a scenario where someone
who was describing a job posting would want to describe an
occupational category inline and relate it to other occupational
categories (broader, narrower, etc), or make other skos like
assertions.

//Ed

Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 15:09:34 UTC