public-script-coord@w3.org from October to December 2013 by date

Friday, 27 December 2013

Re: Spec for [Global] does not seem to be quite web-compatible, and none of the UAs are really compatible with each other Boris Zbarsky
Re: Spec for [Global] does not seem to be quite web-compatible, and none of the UAs are really compatible with each other Olli Pettay

Thursday, 26 December 2013

Re: Spec for [Global] does not seem to be quite web-compatible, and none of the UAs are really compatible with each other Boris Zbarsky
Re: Spec for [Global] does not seem to be quite web-compatible, and none of the UAs are really compatible with each other Garrett Smith
Re: Spec for [Global] does not seem to be quite web-compatible, and none of the UAs are really compatible with each other Boris Zbarsky
Re: Spec for [Global] does not seem to be quite web-compatible, and none of the UAs are really compatible with each other Boris Zbarsky
Re: Spec for [Global] does not seem to be quite web-compatible, and none of the UAs are really compatible with each other Garrett Smith
Re: Spec for [Global] does not seem to be quite web-compatible, and none of the UAs are really compatible with each other Boris Zbarsky
Re: Spec for [Global] does not seem to be quite web-compatible, and none of the UAs are really compatible with each other Garrett Smith

Sunday, 22 December 2013

Thursday, 19 December 2013

[Bug 24141] Consider the interaction of ArrayClass and concat() bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 24141] New: Consider the interaction of ArrayClass and concat() bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 24139] New: buglet in named property visibility algorithm bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 16 December 2013

[Bug 24116] New: Add additional form of Extended Attribute bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 11 December 2013

[Bug 22346] Security: Check origins when invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 10 December 2013

Asking for feedback Stefan Håkansson LK

Monday, 9 December 2013

[Bug 22522] WebIDL, error handling, and promises bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 22522] WebIDL, error handling, and promises bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23367] Move exceptions into IDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Sunday, 8 December 2013

[Bug 22522] WebIDL, error handling, and promises bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 21 November 2013

[Bug 23367] Move exceptions into IDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 22646] So if we want to say on a per-object basis whether it ought to be exposed to workers (which I think is useful) lets introduce "exposed to document environments", "exposed to worker environments", and [...] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 22646] So if we want to say on a per-object basis whether it ought to be exposed to workers (which I think is useful) lets introduce "exposed to document environments", "exposed to worker environments", and [...] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23879] example of distinguishability is wrong bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23879] New: "Consider the effective overload set shown in th..." bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 19 November 2013

Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Joshua Bell
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 18 November 2013

Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Boris Zbarsky
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Jonas Sicking
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Boris Zbarsky
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Rick Waldron
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Rick Waldron
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Boris Zbarsky
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Boris Zbarsky
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Brendan Eich
RE: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Domenic Denicola
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Boris Zbarsky
RE: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Domenic Denicola
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Boris Zbarsky
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Brendan Eich
RE: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Domenic Denicola
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Boris Zbarsky

Saturday, 16 November 2013

Re: sequence and iterables Jonas Sicking
Re: sequence and iterables Boris Zbarsky
Re: sequence and iterables Jonas Sicking
Re: sequence and iterables Boris Zbarsky
Re: sequence and iterables Boris Zbarsky
Re: sequence and iterables Jonas Sicking
Re: sequence and iterables Jonas Sicking
Re: sequence and iterables Boris Zbarsky
Re: sequence and iterables Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: sequence and iterables Boris Zbarsky
Re: sequence and iterables Jonas Sicking
sequence and iterables Boris Zbarsky
[Bug 21740] Guidance on DOMError and promises bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 21740] Guidance on DOMError and promises bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 15 November 2013

[Bug 21740] Guidance on DOMError and promises bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 21740] Guidance on DOMError and promises bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: APIs that have boolean arguments defaulting to true Tab Atkins Jr.
[Bug 21740] Guidance on DOMError and promises bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: APIs that have boolean arguments defaulting to true Jonas Sicking
[Bug 21740] Guidance on DOMError and promises bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 21740] Guidance on DOMError and promises bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: APIs that have boolean arguments defaulting to true Ian Hickson
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Allen Wirfs-Brock
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Boris Zbarsky
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Brendan Eich
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Brendan Eich
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Allen Wirfs-Brock
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Allen Wirfs-Brock
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Boris Zbarsky
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Allen Wirfs-Brock
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Boris Zbarsky
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Brendan Eich
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Boris Zbarsky
RE: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Domenic Denicola
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Allen Wirfs-Brock
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Boris Zbarsky
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Allen Wirfs-Brock
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Allen Wirfs-Brock
RE: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Domenic Denicola
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Allen Wirfs-Brock
[Bug 22346] Security: Check origins when invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Boris Zbarsky
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Rick Waldron
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Allen Wirfs-Brock
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Jason Orendorff
Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Boris Zbarsky
RE: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Domenic Denicola
[Bug 23683] Investigate restricting sequence<T> to iterables bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable Boris Zbarsky
[Bug 23202] Add @@unscopeables sugar bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 14 November 2013

[Bug 23701] Remove TreatUndefinedAs bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
console api - get time start and end values Felipe Nascimento de Moura

Wednesday, 13 November 2013

[Bug 23358] A hook for objects that can enter a "dead" mode bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: an idea for replacing arguments.length Boris Zbarsky
[Bug 23683] Investigate restricting sequence<T> to iterables bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: an idea for replacing arguments.length Brendan Eich
Re: an idea for replacing arguments.length Boris Zbarsky

Tuesday, 12 November 2013

Re: an idea for replacing arguments.length Brendan Eich
Re: an idea for replacing arguments.length Boris Zbarsky
Re: an idea for replacing arguments.length Brendan Eich
Re: APIs that have boolean arguments defaulting to true Jonas Sicking

Monday, 11 November 2013

Re: APIs that have boolean arguments defaulting to true Brendan Eich
Re: APIs that have boolean arguments defaulting to true Garrett Smith
Re: APIs that have boolean arguments defaulting to true Boris Zbarsky
Re: APIs that have boolean arguments defaulting to true Tab Atkins Jr.
RE: APIs that have boolean arguments defaulting to true Domenic Denicola
Re: APIs that have boolean arguments defaulting to true Mark S. Miller
APIs that have boolean arguments defaulting to true Boris Zbarsky
Re: an idea for replacing arguments.length Brandon Benvie
Re: an idea for replacing arguments.length Boris Zbarsky
[Bug 18242] Not clear what "script that invoked the method" means exactly in the case of e.g. a.setTimeout(b.postMessage, 0) // called from c bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: an idea for replacing arguments.length Allen Wirfs-Brock
Re: an idea for replacing arguments.length Mark S. Miller
Re: an idea for replacing arguments.length Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: an idea for replacing arguments.length Allen Wirfs-Brock
Re: an idea for replacing arguments.length Mark S. Miller
Re: an idea for replacing arguments.length Jonas Sicking
Re: an idea for replacing arguments.length Boris Zbarsky

Saturday, 9 November 2013

[Bug 23701] Remove TreatUndefinedAs bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 8 November 2013

[Bug 23701] Remove TreatUndefinedAs bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23771] "TreatUndefinedAs=Null" seems pointless bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: Top Level Array Generics David Bruant
Re: Top Level Array Generics David Bruant
Re: Top Level Array Generics Boris Zbarsky
Re: Top Level Array Generics David Bruant
[Bug 23771] "TreatUndefinedAs=Null" seems pointless bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23771] New: "TreatUndefinedAs=Null" seems pointless bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 7 November 2013

Re: Top Level Array Generics Garrett Smith
Top Level Array Generics Garrett Smith

Wednesday, 6 November 2013

[Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: moved Web IDL development to GitHub Marcos Caceres
Re: moved Web IDL development to GitHub Robin Berjon
Re: moved Web IDL development to GitHub Marcos Caceres
moved Web IDL development to GitHub Cameron McCormack

Tuesday, 5 November 2013

Re: Need reviewers for Cameron's Web IDL tests Philippe Le Hegaret
Re: Need reviewers for Cameron's Web IDL tests Cameron McCormack

Friday, 1 November 2013

RE: Need reviewers for Cameron's Web IDL tests Travis Leithead
[Bug 23701] New: Remove TreatUndefinedAs bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23623] Support [Clamp] for sequences bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 31 October 2013

"Figuring out easier readonly interfaces" discussion @ TPAC: Nov 11 17:30 Arthur Barstow

Wednesday, 30 October 2013

[Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23683] Investigate restricting sequence<T> to iterables bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23683] New: Investigate restricting sequence<T> to iterables bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23682] New: Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: ES6 draft, Rev20 is now available Andrea Giammarchi
Re: ES6 draft, Rev20 is now available Andrea Giammarchi
Re: ES6 draft, Rev20 is now available Brendan Eich
Re: ES6 draft, Rev20 is now available Anne van Kesteren
Re: ES6 draft, Rev20 is now available Brendan Eich
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: ES6 draft, Rev20 is now available Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 29 October 2013

Re: ArrayClass should imply @@isConcatSpreadable Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: Need reviewers for Cameron's Web IDL tests Arthur Barstow
[Bug 23034] Requesting ConstraintNotSatisfiedError to be added bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23033] Requesting PermissionDeniedError to be added bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 21740] Guidance on DOMError and promises bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: ArrayClass should imply @@isConcatSpreadable Andreas Rossberg
Re: ArrayClass should imply @@isConcatSpreadable Boris Zbarsky
Re: ArrayClass should imply @@isConcatSpreadable Boris Zbarsky
Re: ArrayClass should imply @@isConcatSpreadable Boris Zbarsky
Re: ArrayClass should imply @@isConcatSpreadable Allen Wirfs-Brock
RE: ArrayClass should imply @@isConcatSpreadable Domenic Denicola
Re: ArrayClass should imply @@isConcatSpreadable Allen Wirfs-Brock
RE: ArrayClass should imply @@isConcatSpreadable Domenic Denicola
Re: ArrayClass should imply @@isConcatSpreadable Allen Wirfs-Brock
Re: ArrayClass should imply @@isConcatSpreadable Jonas Sicking

Monday, 28 October 2013

Re: ArrayClass should imply @@isConcatSpreadable Jonas Sicking
Re: ArrayClass should imply @@isConcatSpreadable Boris Zbarsky
Re: ArrayClass should imply @@isConcatSpreadable Boris Zbarsky
Re: ArrayClass should imply @@isConcatSpreadable Anne van Kesteren
ArrayClass should imply @@isConcatSpreadable Boris Zbarsky

Friday, 25 October 2013

[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23623] Support [Clamp] for sequences bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23623] Support [Clamp] for sequences bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23623] Support [Clamp] for sequences bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 24 October 2013

[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23623] Support [Clamp] for sequences bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23623] Support [Clamp] for sequences bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23623] Support [Clamp] for sequences bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23623] Support [Clamp] for sequences bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23623] Support [Clamp] for sequences bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23623] New: Support [Clamp] for sequences bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 23 October 2013

[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 16725] Treat omitted dictionary the same as empty dictionary bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 16725] Treat omitted dictionary the same as empty dictionary bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 16725] Treat omitted dictionary the same as empty dictionary bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 16725] Treat omitted dictionary the same as empty dictionary bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23602] "optional any" is nonsense that should be disallowed bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23604] New: Dictionaries should always be considered optional, with null as default value bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23602] "optional any" is nonsense that should be disallowed bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23602] "optional any" is nonsense that should be disallowed bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23602] New: "optional any" is nonsense that should be disallowed bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 16725] Treat omitted dictionary the same as empty dictionary bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 22 October 2013

[Bug 16725] Treat omitted dictionary the same as empty dictionary bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: Conventions for composed words in enum Anne van Kesteren
Re: Conventions for composed words in enum Harald Alvestrand
Re: Promises and Decidability in Asynchronous Error Handling Kevin Smith

Monday, 21 October 2013

Re: Promises and Decidability in Asynchronous Error Handling Andrea Giammarchi
RE: Promises and Decidability in Asynchronous Error Handling Domenic Denicola
Re: Promises and Decidability in Asynchronous Error Handling Kevin Smith
RE: Promises and Decidability in Asynchronous Error Handling Domenic Denicola
Re: Promises and Decidability in Asynchronous Error Handling Kevin Smith
Re: Promises and Decidability in Asynchronous Error Handling Andrea Giammarchi
RE: Promises and Decidability in Asynchronous Error Handling Domenic Denicola
Re: Promises and Decidability in Asynchronous Error Handling K. Gadd
Promises and Decidability in Asynchronous Error Handling Kevin Smith
Re: Conventions for composed words in enum Anne van Kesteren
Re: Conventions for composed words in enum Boris Zbarsky
Re: Conventions for composed words in enum Anne van Kesteren
Conventions for composed words in enum Dominique Hazael-Massieux
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Simon Pieters

Friday, 18 October 2013

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: Possible compat problem with treating undefined as not passed in WebIDL Boris Zbarsky
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tab Atkins Jr.
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Simon Pieters
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 17 October 2013

Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Simon Pieters
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Simon Pieters
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Robert O'Callahan
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Brandon Benvie
RE: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Domenic Denicola
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces James Graham
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Dirk Schulze
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces James Graham
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Simon Pieters
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Anne van Kesteren
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Anne van Kesteren
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Simon Pieters
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Dirk Schulze
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 16 October 2013

Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Simon Pieters
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Dirk Schulze
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23534] freeze/seal/preventExtensions should throw for Nodes (and maybe any WebIDL interface) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23534] freeze/seal/preventExtensions should throw for Nodes (and maybe any WebIDL interface) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23534] New: freeze/seal/preventExtensions should throw for Nodes (and maybe any WebIDL interface) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 23532] New: Dealing with undefined bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 15 October 2013

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 14 October 2013

Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Robert O'Callahan
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Anne van Kesteren
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions Dirk Schulze
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Dirk Schulze
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Anne van Kesteren
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Robert O'Callahan
Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions Dirk Schulze

Sunday, 13 October 2013

Re: Allowing IDL attributes to have different types for the getter and setter Anne van Kesteren

Friday, 11 October 2013

Re: Allowing IDL attributes to have different types for the getter and setter Jonas Sicking
Re: Allowing IDL attributes to have different types for the getter and setter François REMY
RE: Allowing IDL attributes to have different types for the getter and setter Domenic Denicola
RE: Allowing IDL attributes to have different types for the getter and setter Jonas Sicking
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Thursday, 10 October 2013

[Bug 22346] Security: When invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another, we need to do a security check bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Re: Using arrays in platform APIs Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 8 October 2013

[Bug 21929] named properties object should disallow definition of non-configurable properties bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 7 October 2013

[Bug 22824] Remove Date from WebIDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
[Bug 21929] named properties object should disallow definition of non-configurable properties bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Saturday, 5 October 2013

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 4 October 2013

Re: Possible compat problem with treating undefined as not passed in WebIDL Boris Zbarsky
Re: Possible compat problem with treating undefined as not passed in WebIDL Anne van Kesteren
Re: Possible compat problem with treating undefined as not passed in WebIDL Boris Zbarsky
Re: Good use cases for WebIDL overloads? Anne van Kesteren
Re: Possible compat problem with treating undefined as not passed in WebIDL Anne van Kesteren
Good use cases for WebIDL overloads? Jonas Sicking
Re: Possible compat problem with treating undefined as not passed in WebIDL Jonas Sicking
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Allen Wirfs-Brock

Thursday, 3 October 2013

Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: Possible compat problem with treating undefined as not passed in WebIDL Boris Zbarsky
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
RE: Need reviewers for Cameron's Web IDL tests Travis Leithead
Re: Possible compat problem with treating undefined as not passed in WebIDL Joshua Bell
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Allen Wirfs-Brock
Re: JSIDL ideas for read only (Was: RE: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces) Tab Atkins Jr.
RE: JSIDL ideas for read only (Was: RE: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces) Domenic Denicola
Re: JSIDL ideas for read only (Was: RE: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces) Boris Zbarsky
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Robert O'Callahan
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Robert O'Callahan
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: JSIDL ideas for read only (Was: RE: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces) Domenic Denicola
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Robert O'Callahan
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: JSIDL ideas for read only (Was: RE: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces) Boris Zbarsky
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Robert O'Callahan
RE: JSIDL ideas for read only (Was: RE: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces) Domenic Denicola
RE: JSIDL ideas for read only (Was: RE: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces) Domenic Denicola
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tom Van Cutsem
Possible compat problem with treating undefined as not passed in WebIDL Boris Zbarsky
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Boris Zbarsky
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Boris Zbarsky
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: JSIDL ideas for read only (Was: RE: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces) Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: JSIDL ideas for read only (Was: RE: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces) Boris Zbarsky
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Boris Zbarsky
JSIDL ideas for read only (Was: RE: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces) Domenic Denicola

Wednesday, 2 October 2013

Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tab Atkins Jr.
RE: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Domenic Denicola
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Allen Wirfs-Brock
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Mark S. Miller
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Allen Wirfs-Brock
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Allen Wirfs-Brock
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Boris Zbarsky
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Boris Zbarsky
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Jonas Sicking
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Boris Zbarsky
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Boris Zbarsky
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Boris Zbarsky
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Boris Zbarsky
Figuring out easier readonly interfaces Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: Need reviewers for Cameron's Web IDL tests Garrett Smith
Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions Simon Pieters
Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions Robert O'Callahan
Re: Need reviewers for Cameron's Web IDL tests Philippe Le Hegaret
Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions Simon Pieters

Tuesday, 1 October 2013

Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions Robert O'Callahan
Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions Simon Pieters
Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions Robert O'Callahan
Re: Need reviewers for Cameron's Web IDL tests Arthur Barstow
Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions Simon Pieters

Last message date: Friday, 27 December 2013 14:50:22 UTC