- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:12:37 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20567 --- Comment #41 from Bobby Holley (:bholley) <bobbyholley@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Bobby Holley (:bholley) from comment #40) > I see. How about we just make adoptNode throw for any element with a > binding? I don't imagine anyone would complain too hard about that. (And in the recursive case, it might arguably be better to just skip bound children than to cripple the whole abort. I'm just saying we should be creative and willing to say "we don't support that" when necessary, especially with nascent technology that doesn't carry a significant compatibility burden). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 09:12:39 UTC