Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2013-10-03 (public-script-coord@w3.org from October to December 2013)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:16:28 -0700
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDrfCYBOMNhP11_+dnbcSf=3HW2G=sfjP5O3Fwx82wU=g@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> On 10/2/13 9:11 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> Ideally, it should work as long as you only use
>> parts that exist in the supertype.
>
> In that case you should declare your function as taking the supertype, I
> would argue.

Valid point.

~TJ

Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 01:17:15 UTC