On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com> wrote: > This sounds great! I think in my long-ago message I was assuming that > Object.observe-like technology would be unavailable. Or that there was a > constraint that the returned value be frozen (even if the property was > itself settable). I hope this gets implemented as you propose, as that's > exactly how it should work! Note that Allen expressed concern about this approach last TC39 meeting, though I'm having trouble getting him to follow up on this list. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Sunday, 13 October 2013 17:13:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:18 UTC