Re: Allowing IDL attributes to have different types for the getter and setter

On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Domenic Denicola
<domenic@domenicdenicola.com> wrote:
> This sounds great! I think in my long-ago message I was assuming that
> Object.observe-like technology would be unavailable. Or that there was a
> constraint that the returned value be frozen (even if the property was
> itself settable). I hope this gets implemented as you propose, as that's
> exactly how it should work!

Note that Allen expressed concern about this approach last TC39
meeting, though I'm having trouble getting him to follow up on this
list.


-- 
http://annevankesteren.nl/