- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:02:01 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23532 Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonas@sicking.cc --- Comment #26 from Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> --- Though the same could probably be said for calling func(undefined). That seems likely to have happen due to code like function doStuff(a) { ... func(a); ... } doStuff(); or function doStuff(a) { ... func(a.value); ... } doStuff({ x: 12, y: 13 }); I can't say I have a strong opinion here. I still dislike the idea of having a split between old and new functions, but maybe it's better than the alternative. One possible out would be to add warnings whenever undefined is passed to a required argument. And then slowly try to migrate old APIs to the new convention. But it sounds like bz's appetite is pretty low for that which I can understand given the amount of web-breaking experiments he's been through lately. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2013 22:02:03 UTC