Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces

* Mark S. Miller wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:
>> This thread petered out, but we need to resolve the issue. No-one has
>> proposed any better naming convention AFAIK. I think we should go with
>> DOMRectReadOnly until someone puts forward a name they think is better.
>
>DOMRectReader
>
>Instances of this type can read DOMRects. The interface doesn't state what
>else they can or cannot do.

It seems it would have to be something like "-Read" or "-Reading" as the
interface is implemented by rectangle objects to provide read access to
their properties, and not by objects that read rectangles.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Monday, 14 October 2013 13:54:10 UTC