W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2013

[Bug 23532] Dealing with undefined

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:44:36 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-23532-3890-0ZaDEjZk3A@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

--- Comment #8 from Erik Arvidsson <arv@chromium.org> ---
(In reply to Glenn Maynard from comment #7)
> Given that the platform already seems to have interop, shouldn't ES optional
> parameters be the one doing the aligning?

We talked about this in length several times over the last year. Using
arguments.length as the base for optional parameters has too many issues. See
es-discuss and notes from multiple f2f tc39 meetings.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 15:44:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:18 UTC