- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:44:36 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23532 --- Comment #8 from Erik Arvidsson <arv@chromium.org> --- (In reply to Glenn Maynard from comment #7) > Given that the platform already seems to have interop, shouldn't ES optional > parameters be the one doing the aligning? We talked about this in length several times over the last year. Using arguments.length as the base for optional parameters has too many issues. See es-discuss and notes from multiple f2f tc39 meetings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 15:44:37 UTC