Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable

On 11/18/13 1:19 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
> Let's say I pass a sequence containing 1000 numbers to such a function. Your proposed behavior is, from what I understand,

You understand correctly.

> which only does 1000 iterations.

I think counting "iterations" is not the right way to think about 
performance here.  The performance cost of incrementing a loop counter 
is tiny.

I assume you did read the thread starting at 


Received on Monday, 18 November 2013 18:25:06 UTC