W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:24:30 -0500
Message-ID: <528A5B5E.9000307@mit.edu>
To: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On 11/18/13 1:19 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
> Let's say I pass a sequence containing 1000 numbers to such a function. Your proposed behavior is, from what I understand,

You understand correctly.

> which only does 1000 iterations.

I think counting "iterations" is not the right way to think about 
performance here.  The performance cost of incrementing a loop counter 
is tiny.

I assume you did read the thread starting at

Received on Monday, 18 November 2013 18:25:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:19 UTC