On 11/18/13 1:19 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: > Let's say I pass a sequence containing 1000 numbers to such a function. Your proposed behavior is, from what I understand, You understand correctly. > which only does 1000 iterations. I think counting "iterations" is not the right way to think about performance here. The performance cost of incrementing a loop counter is tiny. I assume you did read the thread starting at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2013OctDec/0358.html ? -BorisReceived on Monday, 18 November 2013 18:25:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:19 UTC