W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces

From: Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:41:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CABHxS9h+4UA=35ns7ana3MWpqmpizuX_mq3UJB_J=DZsdY9tmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: public-script-coord@w3.org
cheers, MarkM
On Oct 14, 2013 6:53 AM, "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> * Mark S. Miller wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org
>wrote:
> >> This thread petered out, but we need to resolve the issue. No-one has
> >> proposed any better naming convention AFAIK. I think we should go with
> >> DOMRectReadOnly until someone puts forward a name they think is better.
> >
> >DOMRectReader
> >
> >Instances of this type can read DOMRects. The interface doesn't state
what
> >else they can or cannot do.
>
> It seems it would have to be something like "-Read" or "-Reading" as the
> interface is implemented by rectangle objects to provide read access to
> their properties, and not by objects that read rectangles.

Those would be fine.

> --
> Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
> Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
> 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 14 October 2013 15:41:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:18 UTC