- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 05:45:39 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20567 Scott Miles <sjmiles@chromium.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sjmiles@chromium.org --- Comment #46 from Scott Miles <sjmiles@chromium.org> --- To be clear, I'm one of the guys pushing on Dominic to emphasize developer ergonomics, but I think he is drawing the right lines here. I too am uncomfortable with failing zero-tolerance for memory leaks. But I believe it can be necessary for ergonomic concerns to trump leak robustness if the likelihood or total cost of the leaks, as a practical matter, is not significant. One last thing: although it's tempting to try to omnibus improvements to document handling into this bug, I lean towards doing Occum's minimum from existing semantics. In other words, cross document node handling is already tricky, it may be better to fix that in isolation from Custom Elements. Anyway, summary: Dominic has my proxy. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 18 October 2013 05:45:41 UTC