On Oct 14, 2013, at 3:46 PM, Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com> wrote: > "just readable, might be mutable" is self contradictory. I think you mean "readable, might be mutable". I suggest FooReader. This clearly states that it provides the ability to read a Foo, and does not state what other access it does or does not provide. > > "Only" should mean only. I am sorry, I didn't see that the discussion about the naming already continues on a different thread "Figuring out easier readonly interfaces". My fault. I suggest we continue discussion the name there. My apologies. Greetings, DirkReceived on Monday, 14 October 2013 14:05:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:18 UTC