- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:13:08 -0500
- To: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
I'm no longer entirely convinced that sequence should necessarily map to iterables. In particular, sequence as currently specced would correspond to snapshotting the iterable immediately, but that's an odd thing to do with an iterable. A more natural representation of iterables might be some sort of iterator object, though then you have to be very careful about it throwing exceptions, etc... -Boris
Received on Saturday, 16 November 2013 02:13:39 UTC