This is promoting a fix in the `Object.prototype` ... and since I believe those dark days where `Object.prototype` shouldn't be touched due for/in loops, I like it ^_^ Or maybe it's just a matter of `Arguments.prototype` , the most common non iterable always converted via slice? On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.com> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Brendan Eich<brendan@mozilla.com> >> wrote: >> >>> > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> >>>> >> This is different from how sequence<T> behaves in IDL. (It uses >>>> >> array-likes.) :/ >>>> >>> > >>> > This is more general, since array-likes should be iterable to be like >>> > arrays, which are iterable. >>> > >>> > So this seems ok. Right? >>> >> >> An array-like only "length" and properties "0", "1", ... as far as I >> know. I thought iterable meant they implement the iterator protocol. >> > > The meaning of array-like is evolving, maybe. I know, this means old > array-likes don't iterate without work. Temporary migration problem? > > /be > > ______________________________**_________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/es-discuss<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss> >
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 18:00:50 UTC