W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Conventions for composed words in enum

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:29:57 +0200
Message-ID: <52662975.7020608@alvestrand.no>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
On 10/21/2013 02:57 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote:
>> But given that I've only found a few such examples, I would like to
>> confirm this is indeed the correct approach; also, is there any document
>> where this could documented? http://www.w3.org/TR/api-design/ would seem
>> logical, but I don't think it is maintained any more.
> Yeah, lowercase, no separators.
not to be a pain, but why is the answer here "lowercase" and not 
"camelCase" or "CamelCase"?

trying to understand why this case (identifiers represented as strings) 
is different from other identifiers.
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2013 07:30:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:18 UTC