- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:01:55 +0200
- To: "allen@wirfs-brock.com" <allen@wirfs-brock.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > Allen, we discussed this briefly during the last TC39 meeting and it > seemed you had some different ideas on how to approach these. Ping! Without input we might end up with something that cannot be changed into this compatibly: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757664#c45 > 1) Exposing file-like objects through <input type=type>.files as > array. Modifications to the array (e.g. via push()) would take affect. > The way this is accomplished is through the <input type=file> > implementation using Array.observe(). Elements in the array that are > not Blob or File would be ignored. > > 2) Exposing a list of elements as the result of a query operation on a > DOM. The idea is to have a subclass of Array named Elements on which > you can perform further queries. > > In both cases reusing Array is convenient as it guarantees all the > Array methods to be available as well as future Array methods and does > not require re-implementing them. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 10 October 2013 08:02:24 UTC