W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 08:42:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCO0Bamv1MCKpGM8bv1t7huCz1bfgEvEES2d80g9-TX0g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>
Cc: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com> wrote:
> Does anything need DOMRectReadOnly, or would DOMRect and AbstractRect
> satisfy all current needs?

No, we need all of the attributes defined there.

~TJ

Received on Friday, 18 October 2013 15:43:37 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org: "[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt?"
Previous message: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org: "[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt?"
In reply to: Mark S. Miller: "Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces"
Next in thread: Simon Pieters: "Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:18 UTC