* are gone On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Andrea Giammarchi < andrea.giammarchi@gmail.com> wrote: > This is promoting a fix in the `Object.prototype` ... and since I believe > those dark days where `Object.prototype` shouldn't be touched due for/in > loops, I like it ^_^ > > Or maybe it's just a matter of `Arguments.prototype` , the most common non > iterable always converted via slice? > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.com>wrote: > >> Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Brendan Eich<brendan@mozilla.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>>> >>>>> >> This is different from how sequence<T> behaves in IDL. (It uses >>>>> >> array-likes.) :/ >>>>> >>>> > >>>> > This is more general, since array-likes should be iterable to be like >>>> > arrays, which are iterable. >>>> > >>>> > So this seems ok. Right? >>>> >>> >>> An array-like only "length" and properties "0", "1", ... as far as I >>> know. I thought iterable meant they implement the iterator protocol. >>> >> >> The meaning of array-like is evolving, maybe. I know, this means old >> array-likes don't iterate without work. Temporary migration problem? >> >> /be >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> es-discuss@mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/es-discuss<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 18:01:08 UTC