W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Good use cases for WebIDL overloads?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 10:25:04 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnb78gBMAEUT3kEpGhqBZw5R07sUmJii6n9YAAo3J7XjfBn3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> With the flexibility of optional arguments, default values, unions and
> dictionaries, are there really good use cases for overloads other than
> legacy APIs?

http://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/#formdata seems okay to me. Although it's
been suggested to nuke the filename parameter... If we do that, I
don't really see a use case.

Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 08:25:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:18 UTC