- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 02:23:21 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20567 --- Comment #37 from Dominic Cooney <dominicc@chromium.org> --- (In reply to Bobby Holley (:bholley) from comment #30) > Option 2 seems like the best option to me. ... WebComponents bindings are > probably removed. ... I just wanted to chime in: WebComponents bindings *aren't* removed. To be specific, Custom Elements currently don't change prototype and their callbacks continue to fire when moved to a different document. Although Custom Elements are nascent I think a resolution of this bug has to include a path for Custom Elements. We're currently in the Option 1 world. I think Option 1 is preferable because it is simple; the handling of a node adopted into a different document behaves the same way as a node removed from a document but kept around with a reference from JavaScript. The downside is it is more leaky than other options. However other options aren't leak-free anyway, so I argue they're not worth the added complexity. We (=Blink) tried mightily to implement something like Option 2 for Custom Elements. Ultimately it failed because the web developers we were talking to found it surprising that Custom Elements became neutered when adopted into a different document. In the implementation we got snared on brambles like when to deliver the leftView callback for a Custom Element in the process of changing prototypes. Explaining what is happening to the developer is super complex and implies extra callbacks or something. We couldn't figure it out. I'm happy to go into details but maybe video chat with interested parties will be quicker than bug threads. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2013 02:23:23 UTC