- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:45:51 -0800
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > The performance cost of using the object-happy insanity that is > IteratorStep/IteratorValue completely dwarfs the extra over an array here, > as far as I can tell. ;) As noted in the threads about iterators, engines should be able to optimize this away in common cases, like a for-of loop. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 18 November 2013 18:46:43 UTC