W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Conventions for composed words in enum

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:18:51 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnb78jw7AHmPwodFcXaOO2f_tP67WsCgxLwimu2ht4LM9UqEQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> On 10/21/13 3:31 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
>> The question has arisen on how to turn a composed phrase into the
>> corresponding string value of the enum (i.e. "audioInput" vs
>> "audio-input" vs "audioinput").
> Or "audio input"?  It always struck me as a bit odd that we would turn that
> into "audioinput"; the latter is way harder to read....

We already have "arraybuffer"... Using whitespace as a non-separator
seems somewhat weird.

Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 14:19:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:18 UTC