W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 08:24:26 +0200
To: "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>
Cc: "James Graham" <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>, "Domenic Denicola" <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.w5aj20feidj3kv@simons-macbook-pro.local> 
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:14:09 +0200, Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com>  
wrote:

> Does anything need DOMRectReadOnly, or would DOMRect and AbstractRect
> satisfy all current needs?

Mutable and read-only are needed. DOMQuad.bounds needs read-only, various  
SVG things need read-only if they are switching to using these objects.

AbstractRect in the quoted email doesn't satisfy the read-only need since  
it's not a thing that is visible to JS.

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 06:24:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:18 UTC