ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2010: by thread

Re: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-11.txt Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 30 March)
IETF77 meeting minutes Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 30 March)
Re: 100 Continue and Expects Greg Wilkins (Saturday, 27 March)
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects David Morris (Saturday, 27 March)
  - Re: 100 Continue and Expects Greg Wilkins (Saturday, 27 March)
    - Re: 100 Continue and Expects Jamie Lokier (Sunday, 28 March)
    - Re: 100 Continue and Expects Greg Wilkins (Sunday, 28 March)
    - Re: 100 Continue and Expects Jamie Lokier (Sunday, 28 March)
    - Re: 100 Continue and Expects Henrik Nordström (Sunday, 28 March)
    - Re: 100 Continue and Expects Jamie Lokier (Monday, 29 March)
    - Re: 100 Continue and Expects Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 30 March)
    - Re: 100 Continue and Expects Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA) (Monday, 29 March)
    - Re: 100 Continue and Expects Mark Pauley (Wednesday, 31 March)
    - Re: 100 Continue and Expects Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 31 March)
    - Re: 100 Continue and Expects Mark Pauley (Wednesday, 31 March)
    - Re: 100 Continue and Expects Mark Nottingham (Monday, 29 March)
- Re: 100 Continue and Expects Henrik Nordström (Sunday, 28 March)
  - Re: 100 Continue and Expects Jamie Lokier (Monday, 29 March)
proposal for issue #175 range flooding Yves Lafon (Thursday, 25 March)
Issue 39: proposed example for varying the etag based on conneg Julian Reschke (Thursday, 25 March)
- Re: Issue 39: proposed example for varying the etag based on conneg Nathan (Thursday, 25 March)
proposal for issue #178 Yves Lafon (Thursday, 25 March)
httpbis and deflate compression... Mahdavi, Jamshid (Tuesday, 23 March)
- Re: httpbis and deflate compression... Dan Winship (Tuesday, 23 March)
  - Re: httpbis and deflate compression... Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 23 March)
    - Re: httpbis and deflate compression... David Morris (Friday, 26 March)
    - RE: httpbis and deflate compression... Mahdavi, Jamshid (Friday, 26 March)
    - Re: httpbis and deflate compression... Dan Winship (Friday, 26 March)
- #73: httpbis and deflate compression... Mark Nottingham (Friday, 26 March)
  - Re: #73: httpbis and deflate compression... Yves Lafon (Sunday, 28 March)
    - Re: #73: httpbis and deflate compression... Mark Nottingham (Monday, 29 March)
  - Re: #73: httpbis and deflate compression... Martin J. Dürst (Monday, 29 March)
Comment on draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-10 section 4.3 Chris Newman (Monday, 22 March)
- Re: Comment on draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-10 section 4.3 Julian Reschke (Monday, 29 March)
Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155] Henry S. Thompson (Sunday, 21 March)
- Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155] Yves Lafon (Thursday, 25 March)
  - Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155] David Morris (Thursday, 25 March)
Re: RFC 5789 on PATCH Method for HTTP Julian Reschke (Friday, 19 March)
HTTPbis Working Group meeting next Monday in Anaheim, CA Julian Reschke (Thursday, 18 March)
204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Nathan (Sunday, 14 March)
- Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Reto Bachmann-Gmür (Sunday, 14 March)
  - Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Nathan (Sunday, 14 March)
- Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Nathan (Sunday, 14 March)
  - Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Jonathan Rees (Sunday, 14 March)
    - Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Subbu Allamaraju (Sunday, 14 March)
    - Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Nathan (Sunday, 14 March)
    - Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Nathan (Monday, 15 March)
  - Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 15 March)
    - Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Nathan (Monday, 15 March)
- Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Subbu Allamaraju (Sunday, 14 March)
- Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Martin J. Dürst (Monday, 15 March)
  - Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Nathan (Monday, 15 March)
    - Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 15 March)
3 short questions, Entity Tag & Content Location Nathan (Friday, 12 March)
- Re: 3 short questions, Entity Tag & Content Location Julian Reschke (Sunday, 14 March)
  - Re: 3 short questions, Entity Tag & Content Location Nathan (Sunday, 14 March)
    - Re: 3 short questions, Entity Tag & Content Location Julian Reschke (Sunday, 14 March)
- Re: 3 short questions, Entity Tag & Content Location Yves Lafon (Sunday, 14 March)
W3C Account and HTMLWG Participation "Unlinked" Jace Voracek (Friday, 12 March)
300 Multiple Choices and safe methods Robert Brewer (Thursday, 11 March)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-05.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Wednesday, 10 March)
Re: [Fwd: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments)] Nathan (Wednesday, 10 March)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-04.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Wednesday, 10 March)
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-04.txt Adam Barth (Wednesday, 10 March)
  - Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-04.txt Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 10 March)
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-04.txt =JeffH (Wednesday, 10 March)
no-cache response directive Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 10 March)
- Re: no-cache response directive Henrik Nordström (Wednesday, 10 March)
Issues addressed in -09 drafts Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 10 March)
#204 (editorial): Clock requirement for caches Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 9 March)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 8 March)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-03.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 8 March)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 8 March)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 8 March)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 8 March)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 8 March)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 8 March)
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org (Monday, 8 March)
New version of Cache Context draft Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA) (Sunday, 7 March)
Amazon.com - Your Cancellation (495-265546-13651) order-update@amazon.com (Saturday, 6 March)
HTTPbis Range header Nathan (Friday, 5 March)
- Re: HTTPbis Range header Yves Lafon (Sunday, 7 March)
- Re: HTTPbis Range header Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 9 March)
DRAFT Anaheim agenda Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 4 March)
- Re: DRAFT Anaheim agenda Julian Reschke (Monday, 22 March)
Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 4 March)
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Adrien de Croy (Monday, 8 March)
  - Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age David Morris (Monday, 8 March)
    - Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 9 March)
    - Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 9 March)
    - Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 9 March)
    - Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 9 March)
    - Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 10 March)
    - Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 10 March)
    - Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 11 March)
    - Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke (Thursday, 11 March)
    - Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 17 March)
    - Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 17 March)
    - Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 18 March)
    - Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke (Monday, 22 March)
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke (Monday, 8 March)
- Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke (Monday, 8 March)
Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 3 March)
- Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 9 March)
  - Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 10 March)
    - Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 10 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Toby Inkster (Wednesday, 10 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonas Sicking (Wednesday, 10 March)
    - warning: redirect test cases broken, was: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 10 March)
    - Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke (Thursday, 11 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonas Sicking (Thursday, 11 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 11 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke (Thursday, 11 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonas Sicking (Thursday, 11 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke (Thursday, 11 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonas Sicking (Thursday, 11 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 11 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonas Sicking (Friday, 12 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 13 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke (Friday, 12 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Toby Inkster (Friday, 12 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Boris Zbarsky (Wednesday, 10 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 10 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Nathan Rixham (Wednesday, 10 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke (Thursday, 11 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonathan Rees (Thursday, 11 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Nathan (Thursday, 11 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke (Thursday, 11 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke (Thursday, 11 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonathan Rees (Friday, 12 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke (Friday, 12 March)
    - Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Nathan (Friday, 12 March)
#147: header-specific canonicalisation Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 3 March)
- Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Yves Lafon (Wednesday, 3 March)
  - Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 3 March)
    - Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Yves Lafon (Wednesday, 3 March)
    - Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 4 March)
    - Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Julian Reschke (Thursday, 4 March)
    - Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Julian Reschke (Friday, 5 March)
    - Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 4 March)
    - Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Julian Reschke (Thursday, 4 March)
    - Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 4 March)
- Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Brian Smith (Thursday, 4 March)
Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 3 March)
- Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Brian Smith (Monday, 8 March)
  - Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 9 March)
Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt Mark Nottingham (Monday, 1 March)
- rel=meta and the Link Relation Type registry (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt) Michael Hausenblas (Thursday, 4 March)
  - Re: rel=meta and the Link Relation Type registry (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt) Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 9 March)
one time passwords from private keys Story Henry (Sunday, 28 February)
Cache behavior for authenticated contents Yutaka OIWA (Friday, 26 February)
[410 Gone] HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics Karl Dubost (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [410 Gone] HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics Mark Baker (Thursday, 25 February)
FYI: Anaheim IETF meeting Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 23 February)
FYI: IETF LC for draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http Julian Reschke (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: FYI: IETF LC for draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http Julian Reschke (Monday, 29 March)
Expect: 100-continue and proxies Joe Orton (Sunday, 21 February)
- Re: Expect: 100-continue and proxies Jamie Lokier (Sunday, 21 February)
  - Re: Expect: 100-continue and proxies Joe Orton (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: Expect: 100-continue and proxies Jeffrey Mogul (Monday, 22 February)
p1-messaging proofreading Anthony Bryan (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: p1-messaging proofreading Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 17 February)
User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Julian Reschke (Friday, 12 February)
  - Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 12 February)
    - Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Adam Barth (Sunday, 14 February)
    - Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Roy T. Fielding (Sunday, 14 February)
    - Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Maciej Stachowiak (Sunday, 14 February)
  - Issue 10, was: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Julian Reschke (Friday, 12 February)
    - Re: Issue 10, was: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Adam Barth (Friday, 12 February)
Review of third Last Call of Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies Francois Daoust (Thursday, 11 February)
The meaning of rev Krzysztof Maczyński (Wednesday, 10 February)
Security considerations for DNS rebinding Maciej Stachowiak (Tuesday, 9 February)
- issue 202, was: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 9 February)
  - Re: issue 202, was: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Tim (Tuesday, 9 February)
  - Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Adam Barth (Tuesday, 9 February)
    - Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Amit Klein (Tuesday, 9 February)
    - Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Maciej Stachowiak (Tuesday, 9 February)
    - Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Adam Barth (Tuesday, 9 February)
    - Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Amit Klein (Wednesday, 10 February)
    - Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Adam Barth (Wednesday, 10 February)
    - Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Maciej Stachowiak (Tuesday, 9 February)
    - RE: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Blake Frantz (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Justin Erenkrantz (Tuesday, 9 February)
FWD: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-09.txt Julian Reschke (Monday, 8 February)
p2-semantics proofreading Anthony Bryan (Sunday, 7 February)
- Re: p2-semantics proofreading Julian Reschke (Monday, 8 February)
allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 5 February)
  - Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke (Friday, 5 February)
    - Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 5 February)
    - Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke (Friday, 5 February)
    - Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 5 February)
    - Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke (Friday, 5 February)
    - Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 5 February)
    - Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Dan Winship (Friday, 5 February)
    - Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Adam Barth (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 9 February)
  - Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 9 February)
    - Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 2 March)
Clarification of http-409 troels knak-nielsen (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: Clarification of http-409 Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 3 February)
p3-payload proofreading Anthony Bryan (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: p3-payload proofreading Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 2 February)
  - Re: p3-payload proofreading Anthony Bryan (Tuesday, 2 February)
    - Re: p3-payload proofreading Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 2 February)
    - Re: p3-payload proofreading Anthony Bryan (Tuesday, 2 February)
    - Re: p3-payload proofreading Julian Reschke (Monday, 8 February)
FYI: Google blog on Unicode Martin J. Dürst (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: FYI: Google blog on Unicode Julian Reschke (Monday, 1 February)
p4-conditional proofreading Anthony Bryan (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: p4-conditional proofreading Julian Reschke (Sunday, 31 January)
  - Re: p4-conditional proofreading Barry Leiba (Sunday, 31 January)
    - Re: p4-conditional proofreading Julian Reschke (Monday, 1 February)
    - Re: p4-conditional proofreading Barry Leiba (Monday, 1 February)
    - Re: p4-conditional proofreading Julian Reschke (Monday, 1 February)
p5-range typo Anthony Bryan (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: p5-range typo Julian Reschke (Thursday, 28 January)
p7-auth typo Anthony Bryan (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: p7-auth typo Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 27 January)
Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Adam Barth (Tuesday, 26 January)
Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Tuesday, 26 January)
  - Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 28 January)
    - Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Martin J. Dürst (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Tuesday, 26 January)
- Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth (Tuesday, 26 January)
Why do caching heuristics exclude 303? Michael Hausenblas (Friday, 22 January)
issue 201, was: header parsing, trailing OWS Julian Reschke (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: issue 201, was: header parsing, trailing OWS Julian Reschke (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke (Thursday, 21 January)
FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 Larry Masinter (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 Adam Barth (Thursday, 21 January)
  - Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 Julian Reschke (Thursday, 21 January)
    - Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 Adam Barth (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: Authentication-Info Header Eran Hammer-Lahav (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication-Info Header Alexey Melnikov (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: Authentication-Info Header Julian Reschke (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication-Info Header Yutaka Oiwa (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: [Fwd: WWW-Authenticate challenge for client-certificates] Bruno Harbulot (Wednesday, 20 January)
WWW-Authenticate challenge for client-certificates Bruno Harbulot (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: WWW-Authenticate challenge for client-certificates Steve Dispensa (Wednesday, 20 January)
FYI: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-08.txt Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 19 January)
- rfc2231-in-http: token characters, was: FYI: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-08.txt Julian Reschke (Friday, 5 February)
Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mike Burrows (Tuesday, 19 January)
  - Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 20 January)
  - anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Thursday, 21 January)
    - Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 22 January)
    - Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Friday, 22 January)
    - Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 29 January)
    - Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Friday, 29 January)
    - Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 5 February)
    - Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Friday, 5 February)
    - Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 19 February)
    - Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Friday, 19 February)
    - Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 26 February)
    - Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Friday, 26 February)
    - Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 28 February)
    - Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Sunday, 28 February)
  - rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Thursday, 21 January)
    - Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 22 January)
    - Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Friday, 22 January)
    - Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 4 February)
    - Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 4 February)
    - Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Thursday, 4 February)
    - Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 4 February)
    - Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 5 February)
    - Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Friday, 5 February)
    - Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham (Monday, 8 February)
    - Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Monday, 8 February)
  - parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Thursday, 21 January)
    - Re: parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mike Burrows (Thursday, 21 January)
    - Re: parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Thursday, 21 January)
    - Re: parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 22 January)
    - Re: parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Friday, 22 January)
  - editorial LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Thursday, 21 January)
    - Re: editorial LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 22 January)
    - Re: editorial LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 4 February)
  - exposing sensitive information in URIs - LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke (Thursday, 21 January)
    - Re: exposing sensitive information in URIs - LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 29 January)
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Subbu Allamaraju (Wednesday, 20 January)
  - Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Jan Algermissen (Thursday, 21 January)
    - Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Subbu Allamaraju (Friday, 22 January)
    - Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Jan Algermissen (Friday, 22 January)
    - Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham (Friday, 29 January)
    - Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Subbu Allamaraju (Friday, 29 January)
Meeting plans re. Anaheim? David Morris (Sunday, 17 January)
- Re: Meeting plans re. Anaheim Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 19 January)
  - Re: Meeting plans re. Anaheim Anne van Kesteren (Saturday, 30 January)
Long-polling to monitor resources Thomson, Martin (Thursday, 14 January)
- Re: [hybi] Long-polling to monitor resources Salvatore Loreto (Thursday, 21 January)
Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 13 January)
Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 =JeffH (Saturday, 9 January)
- Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 =JeffH (Wednesday, 13 January)
  - Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 13 January)
  - Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 Julian Reschke (Friday, 15 January)
(Updating "content negotiation" language, issue 81), and TCN RFC 2295 to Proposed? Larry Masinter (Saturday, 9 January)
Content Negotiation again Larry Masinter (Saturday, 9 January)
- Re: Content Negotiation again Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 12 January)
  - RE: Content Negotiation again Larry Masinter (Wednesday, 13 January)
    - Re: Content Negotiation again Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 13 January)
    - Re: Content Negotiation again Julian Reschke (Friday, 15 January)
Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 Julian Reschke (Friday, 8 January)
Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Albert Lunde (Thursday, 7 January)
  - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Nicolas Alvarez (Thursday, 7 January)
  - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout David Morris (Thursday, 7 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim (Thursday, 7 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Jan Algermissen (Friday, 8 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim (Friday, 8 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Jan Algermissen (Friday, 8 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim (Friday, 8 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout David Morris (Friday, 8 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Jan Algermissen (Friday, 8 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Mike Kelly (Saturday, 9 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Albert Lunde (Saturday, 9 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim (Saturday, 9 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim (Saturday, 9 January)
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Yutaka OIWA (Friday, 8 January)
  - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim (Friday, 8 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Yutaka OIWA (Tuesday, 12 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Yutaka OIWA (Tuesday, 12 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim (Wednesday, 13 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout David Morris (Wednesday, 13 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim (Wednesday, 13 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Bil Corry (Friday, 29 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim (Sunday, 31 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Bil Corry (Sunday, 31 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout mike amundsen (Sunday, 31 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim (Thursday, 25 February)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Bruno Harbulot (Thursday, 25 February)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim (Thursday, 25 February)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Bruno Harbulot (Thursday, 25 February)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim (Thursday, 25 February)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Bil Corry (Saturday, 6 March)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Story Henry (Thursday, 25 February)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Yutaka OIWA (Friday, 19 March)
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Robert Sayre (Wednesday, 13 January)
  - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 13 January)
  - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim (Tuesday, 26 January)
  - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout figroc (Thursday, 28 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Yutaka OIWA (Thursday, 28 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout figroc (Friday, 29 January)
    - Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim (Thursday, 28 January)
Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Henrik Nordstrom (Saturday, 2 January)
- Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 6 January)
  - Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 19 January)
    - Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 19 January)
    - Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 20 January)
    - Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 3 March)
    - Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 3 March)

ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2010 by thread