Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) from Toby Inkster on 2010-03-10 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2010)

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:32:08 -0000
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <dc1fc1acf4c1a6d19bd6a9ab9e561254.squirrel@goddamn.co.uk>

> - UAs appear to treat those consistently (with the exception of Opera,
> but Yngwe already signaled that he's willing to adapt), *but*

Hmmm... Opera's behaviour seems nicer. It's a shame to lose that, but
pragmatically one vendor changing their behaviour is going to be simpler
than all of the others doing so.

-Toby

Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 13:32:44 UTC