- From: Bil Corry <bil@corry.biz>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:42:38 -0800
- To: Yutaka OIWA <y.oiwa@aist.go.jp>
- CC: Tim <tim-projects@sentinelchicken.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Yutaka OIWA wrote on 1/12/2010 6:06 AM: > Tim <tim-projects@sentinelchicken.org> writes: >> However, it probably doesn't make sense to define a new 2XX code, now >> that I think about it more. The same could be achieved by a simple >> header in a 200 OK response. The key here, is to use a 2XX of some >> kind so that if a browser doesn't support the new header, it'll just >> ignore it and developers can use AJAX hacks in the body to achieve the >> same end in popular browsers during the transition period. >> >> Would something like this work with your new protocol? > > I don't know much about a AJAX hack Here's an example of using AJAX to log out a user via HTTP Auth: http://www.corry.biz/logout_demo/ - Bil
Received on Friday, 29 January 2010 09:43:08 UTC