Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation

On 04/03/2010, at 12:05 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Note:
>   If a header field is absent from a request, it can only match another
>   request if it is also absent there.
> Is that still true? I don't think; maybe we can remove the sentence completely?

That means we'd have to re-open <>. 

I think we can address your concern by doing something like

If (after any normalisation that may take place) a header field is absent from a request...

Mark Nottingham

Received on Thursday, 4 March 2010 02:58:20 UTC