- From: Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@subbu.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:19:32 -0800
- To: Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@mac.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
You mean "link-extension" params? Subbu On Jan 20, 2010, at 11:37 PM, Jan Algermissen wrote: > > On Jan 20, 2010, at 10:38 PM, Subbu Allamaraju wrote: > >> The usage of fields is not clear. Sec. 6.3 says that "entries in the Link Relation Type Registry can be extended with application-specific data". But the BNF in Sec. 5 does not specify fields. Could you clarify the intent of fields? > > I understand fields to be meant as link relation specific parameters. > > Jan > > > >> >> Subbu >> >> On Jan 18, 2010, at 9:31 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>> From: Internet-Draft@ietf.org >>>> Date: 19 January 2010 4:30:02 PM AEDT >>>> To: mnot@pobox.com, draft-nottingham-http-link-header@tools.ietf.org,lisa.dusseault@gmail.com >>>> Subject: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt >>>> >>>> New version (-07) has been submitted for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt. >>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt >>>> Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed >>>> >>>> Diff from previous version: >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07 >>>> >>>> IETF Secretariat. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >>> >>> >> >> > > ----------------------------------- > Jan Algermissen, Consultant > > Mail: algermissen@acm.org > Blog: http://www.nordsc.com/blog/ > Work: http://www.nordsc.com/ > ----------------------------------- > > >
Received on Friday, 22 January 2010 18:20:06 UTC