ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2010 by date

Wednesday, 31 March 2010

Re: 100 Continue and Expects Mark Pauley
Re: 100 Continue and Expects Adrien de Croy
Re: 100 Continue and Expects Mark Pauley

Tuesday, 30 March 2010

Re: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-11.txt Julian Reschke
IETF77 meeting minutes Julian Reschke

Monday, 29 March 2010

Re: 100 Continue and Expects Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)

Tuesday, 30 March 2010

Re: 100 Continue and Expects Adrien de Croy

Monday, 29 March 2010

Re: 100 Continue and Expects Jamie Lokier
Re: 100 Continue and Expects Jamie Lokier
Re: 100 Continue and Expects Mark Nottingham
Re: Comment on draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-10 section 4.3 Julian Reschke
Re: FYI: IETF LC for draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http Julian Reschke
Re: #73: httpbis and deflate compression... Mark Nottingham
Re: #73: httpbis and deflate compression... Martin J. Dürst

Sunday, 28 March 2010

Re: 100 Continue and Expects Henrik Nordström
Re: 100 Continue and Expects Henrik Nordström
Re: 100 Continue and Expects Jamie Lokier
Re: #73: httpbis and deflate compression... Yves Lafon
Re: 100 Continue and Expects Greg Wilkins
Re: 100 Continue and Expects Jamie Lokier

Saturday, 27 March 2010

Re: 100 Continue and Expects Greg Wilkins
Re: 100 Continue and Expects David Morris
Re: 100 Continue and Expects Greg Wilkins

Friday, 26 March 2010

#73: httpbis and deflate compression... Mark Nottingham
Re: httpbis and deflate compression... Dan Winship
RE: httpbis and deflate compression... Mahdavi, Jamshid
Re: httpbis and deflate compression... David Morris

Thursday, 25 March 2010

Re: Issue 39: proposed example for varying the etag based on conneg Nathan
proposal for issue #175 range flooding Yves Lafon
Issue 39: proposed example for varying the etag based on conneg Julian Reschke
proposal for issue #178 Yves Lafon
Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155] David Morris
Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155] Yves Lafon

Tuesday, 23 March 2010

Re: httpbis and deflate compression... Julian Reschke
Re: httpbis and deflate compression... Dan Winship
httpbis and deflate compression... Mahdavi, Jamshid

Monday, 22 March 2010

Comment on draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-10 section 4.3 Chris Newman
Re: DRAFT Anaheim agenda Julian Reschke
Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke

Sunday, 21 March 2010

Re: TAG requests addition to section 3.2.1 of Part 3 [#155] Henry S. Thompson

Friday, 19 March 2010

Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Yutaka OIWA
Re: RFC 5789 on PATCH Method for HTTP Julian Reschke

Thursday, 18 March 2010

Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham
HTTPbis Working Group meeting next Monday in Anaheim, CA Julian Reschke

Wednesday, 17 March 2010

Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke
Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham

Monday, 15 March 2010

Sunday, 14 March 2010

Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Nathan
Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Subbu Allamaraju
Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Jonathan Rees
Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Subbu Allamaraju
Re: 3 short questions, Entity Tag & Content Location Yves Lafon
Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Nathan
Re: 3 short questions, Entity Tag & Content Location Julian Reschke
Re: 3 short questions, Entity Tag & Content Location Nathan
Re: 3 short questions, Entity Tag & Content Location Julian Reschke
Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Nathan
Re: 204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Reto Bachmann-Gmür
204 No Content for a resource which is known but has no representation yet? Nathan

Saturday, 13 March 2010

Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Mark Nottingham

Friday, 12 March 2010

Thursday, 11 March 2010

Wednesday, 10 March 2010

Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Nathan Rixham

Thursday, 11 March 2010

300 Multiple Choices and safe methods Robert Brewer
Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 10 March 2010

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-05.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-04.txt =JeffH
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-04.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: [Fwd: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments)] Nathan
warning: redirect test cases broken, was: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-04.txt Adam Barth
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-security-properties-04.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Boris Zbarsky
Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Jonas Sicking
Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke
Re: no-cache response directive Henrik Nordström
Re: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Toby Inkster
Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke
no-cache response directive Mark Nottingham
Issues addressed in -09 drafts Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 9 March 2010

#204 (editorial): Clock requirement for caches Mark Nottingham
Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham
Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke
Re: rel=meta and the Link Relation Type registry (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt) Michael Hausenblas
Re: rel=meta and the Link Relation Type registry (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt) Mark Nottingham
Re: rel=meta and the Link Relation Type registry (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt) Michael Hausenblas
Re: rel=meta and the Link Relation Type registry (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt) Mark Nottingham
Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham
Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke
Re: HTTPbis Range header Mark Nottingham
Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham

Monday, 8 March 2010

Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age David Morris
Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke
Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Brian Smith
Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Julian Reschke
Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Adrien de Croy
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-03.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-09.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

Sunday, 7 March 2010

New version of Cache Context draft Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)
Re: HTTPbis Range header Yves Lafon

Saturday, 6 March 2010

Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Bil Corry
Amazon.com - Your Cancellation (495-265546-13651) order-update@amazon.com

Friday, 5 March 2010

HTTPbis Range header Nathan
Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Julian Reschke

Thursday, 4 March 2010

Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Roy T. Fielding
Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Brian Smith
rel=meta and the Link Relation Type registry (was Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt) Michael Hausenblas
Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Julian Reschke
Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Julian Reschke
Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Roy T. Fielding
DRAFT Anaheim agenda Mark Nottingham
Re: #29: correcting corrected_initial_age Mark Nottingham
Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 3 March 2010

Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Yves Lafon
Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments) Julian Reschke
Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Julian Reschke
Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation Yves Lafon
Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Julian Reschke
#147: header-specific canonicalisation Mark Nottingham
Re: What are "appropriate Cache-Control or Expires header fields" Mark Nottingham
Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 2 March 2010

Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke

Monday, 1 March 2010

Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 28 February 2010

Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
one time passwords from private keys Story Henry
Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham

Friday, 26 February 2010

Cache behavior for authenticated contents Yutaka OIWA
Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 25 February 2010

Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Bruno Harbulot
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Bruno Harbulot
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Story Henry
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
Re: [410 Gone] HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics Mark Baker
[410 Gone] HTTP/1.1, part 2: Message Semantics Karl Dubost

Tuesday, 23 February 2010

FYI: Anaheim IETF meeting Mark Nottingham

Monday, 22 February 2010

Re: Expect: 100-continue and proxies Jeffrey Mogul
FYI: IETF LC for draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http Julian Reschke
Re: Expect: 100-continue and proxies Joe Orton

Sunday, 21 February 2010

Re: Expect: 100-continue and proxies Jamie Lokier
Expect: 100-continue and proxies Joe Orton

Friday, 19 February 2010

Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 17 February 2010

Re: p1-messaging proofreading Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 16 February 2010

p1-messaging proofreading Anthony Bryan

Sunday, 14 February 2010

Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Maciej Stachowiak
Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Roy T. Fielding
Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Adam Barth

Friday, 12 February 2010

Re: Issue 10, was: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Adam Barth
Issue 10, was: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Julian Reschke
Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Maciej Stachowiak
Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Julian Reschke
User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Maciej Stachowiak

Thursday, 11 February 2010

Review of third Last Call of Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies Francois Daoust

Wednesday, 10 February 2010

The meaning of rev Krzysztof Maczyński
Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Adam Barth
Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Amit Klein

Tuesday, 9 February 2010

Re: issue 202, was: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Mark Nottingham
Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Adam Barth
Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Maciej Stachowiak
RE: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Blake Frantz
Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Amit Klein
Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Justin Erenkrantz
Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Adam Barth
Re: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Tim
issue 202, was: Security considerations for DNS rebinding Julian Reschke
Security considerations for DNS rebinding Maciej Stachowiak
Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke
Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Mark Nottingham

Monday, 8 February 2010

Re: p2-semantics proofreading Julian Reschke
Re: p3-payload proofreading Julian Reschke
FWD: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-09.txt Julian Reschke
Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 7 February 2010

p2-semantics proofreading Anthony Bryan

Friday, 5 February 2010

Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Adam Barth
Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Dan Winship
Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Anne van Kesteren
Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke
Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Anne van Kesteren
Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke
Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Anne van Kesteren
Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke
Re: allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Anne van Kesteren
allowable characters in token as used in parameter ABNF Julian Reschke
Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
rfc2231-in-http: token characters, was: FYI: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-08.txt Julian Reschke
Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 4 February 2010

Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Roy T. Fielding
Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Anne van Kesteren
Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: editorial LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 3 February 2010

Re: Clarification of http-409 Julian Reschke
Clarification of http-409 troels knak-nielsen

Tuesday, 2 February 2010

Re: p3-payload proofreading Anthony Bryan
Re: p3-payload proofreading Julian Reschke
Re: p3-payload proofreading Anthony Bryan
Re: p3-payload proofreading Julian Reschke
p3-payload proofreading Anthony Bryan

Monday, 1 February 2010

Re: p4-conditional proofreading Julian Reschke
Re: p4-conditional proofreading Barry Leiba
Re: p4-conditional proofreading Julian Reschke
Re: FYI: Google blog on Unicode Julian Reschke
FYI: Google blog on Unicode Martin J. Dürst

Sunday, 31 January 2010

Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout mike amundsen
Re: p4-conditional proofreading Barry Leiba
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Bil Corry
Re: p4-conditional proofreading Julian Reschke
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim

Saturday, 30 January 2010

Re: Meeting plans re. Anaheim Anne van Kesteren

Friday, 29 January 2010

p4-conditional proofreading Anthony Bryan
Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Bil Corry
Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Subbu Allamaraju
Re: exposing sensitive information in URIs - LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout figroc

Thursday, 28 January 2010

Re: p5-range typo Julian Reschke
p5-range typo Anthony Bryan
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Yutaka OIWA
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout figroc
Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Martin J. Dürst
Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 27 January 2010

Re: p7-auth typo Julian Reschke
p7-auth typo Anthony Bryan

Tuesday, 26 January 2010

Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth
Re: comments on draft-barth-mime-sniffing Adam Barth
Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth
Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth
Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155 Adam Barth
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim

Friday, 22 January 2010

Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Jan Algermissen
Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Subbu Allamaraju
Why do caching heuristics exclude 303? Michael Hausenblas
Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
Re: parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: editorial LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 21 January 2010

Re: [hybi] Long-polling to monitor resources Salvatore Loreto
Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 Adam Barth
Re: issue 201, was: header parsing, trailing OWS Julian Reschke
issue 201, was: header parsing, trailing OWS Julian Reschke
Re: parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
Re: parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mike Burrows
exposing sensitive information in URIs - LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
editorial LC comments on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
parameter quoting - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
rev parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
anchor parameter - LC comment on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
Re: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication-Info Header Yutaka Oiwa
Re: Authentication-Info Header Julian Reschke
Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 Julian Reschke
Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Jan Algermissen
Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 Adam Barth

Wednesday, 20 January 2010

FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 Larry Masinter
Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Mark Nottingham
Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Subbu Allamaraju
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication-Info Header Alexey Melnikov
Re: Authentication-Info Header Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: [Fwd: WWW-Authenticate challenge for client-certificates] Bruno Harbulot
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Julian Reschke
Re: WWW-Authenticate challenge for client-certificates Steve Dispensa

Tuesday, 19 January 2010

Re: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mike Burrows
Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Julian Reschke
WWW-Authenticate challenge for client-certificates Bruno Harbulot
FYI: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-08.txt Julian Reschke
Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Mark Nottingham
Re: Meeting plans re. Anaheim Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 17 January 2010

Meeting plans re. Anaheim? David Morris

Friday, 15 January 2010

Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 Julian Reschke
Re: Content Negotiation again Julian Reschke

Thursday, 14 January 2010

Long-polling to monitor resources Thomson, Martin

Wednesday, 13 January 2010

Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 Julian Reschke
Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 Julian Reschke
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 =JeffH
Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 Julian Reschke
Re: Content Negotiation again Julian Reschke
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Julian Reschke
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Robert Sayre
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout David Morris
RE: Content Negotiation again Larry Masinter
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim

Tuesday, 12 January 2010

Re: Content Negotiation again Julian Reschke
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Yutaka OIWA
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Yutaka OIWA

Saturday, 9 January 2010

Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 =JeffH
(Updating "content negotiation" language, issue 81), and TCN RFC 2295 to Proposed? Larry Masinter
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Albert Lunde
Content Negotiation again Larry Masinter
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Mike Kelly

Friday, 8 January 2010

Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Jan Algermissen
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Jan Algermissen
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout David Morris
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
Re: suggestions for examples and explication wrt ABNF and header fields in draft-ietf-httpbis-p1 Julian Reschke
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Yutaka OIWA
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Jan Algermissen

Thursday, 7 January 2010

Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout David Morris
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Nicolas Alvarez
Re: Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Albert Lunde
Past Proposals for HTTP Auth Logout Tim

Wednesday, 6 January 2010

Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Julian Reschke

Saturday, 2 January 2010

Re: #197: Effect of CC directives on history lists Henrik Nordstrom

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 March 2010 23:00:26 UTC